56
I don't get Maoists at all
(lemmygrad.ml)
Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.
A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities
The origin of "Maoism" as it's used today goes back to China after Mao's death, where there was a power struggle between those who stuck closer to Mao's teachings (Peasant Democracy and political education/activism) and the more Technocratic, economically liberal elements.
In reality, the result was that moderates took power and did their best to appease both sides; but to the Maoists, they believe that after Mao's death China fell to Liberal revisionism and the Gang of Four, the leaders of the Maoist movement, were exiled.
Maoism was popularized outside of China by Peru's Shining Path, led by Chairman Gonzalo.
Ah, I wasn't aware of that. I thought Maoism was just subscribing to communism with Chinese characteristics.
"Maoists" hate Socialism with Chinese Characteristics. They are ultras. Basically China's version of Trotskyites. No existing socialism is good enough for them because it's never pure enough, left enough, or revolutionary enough. It is deeply ironic that they call themselves "Maoists" because Mao himself made pragmatic compromises with the national bourgeoisie under the framework of New Democracy that today's "Maoists" would call revisionist, liberal and a betrayal of socialism. Those who follow the real spirit of Mao's teachings in China don't call it "Maoism", they call it Mao Zendong Thought. They view this as simply a part of Marxism-Leninism. China today takes a 70-30 view on Mao. 70% of what he did was good, 30% not so good. In particular they are very critical of the ultra-left tendencies of the chaotic Cultural Revolution era toward the end of Mao's life.
Now, personally i'd put it more around 80-20 or even 90-10, because i see a lot of value in certain elements of the Cultural Revolution, even if mistakes were made and ultimately the overall strategy was misguided. So it's not like i'm unsympathetic to Maoists who admire that period. I understand where they're coming from, even if it's idealist. But we also have to acknowledge that the more moderate post-Mao policies of the CPC have been a resounding success in terms of improving the material conditions of hundreds of millions of people. Unfortunately Maoists refuse to see this reality. And like the Trotskyists, they make themselves unwitting accomplices of imperialism when they take their irrationally hostile stance against China and the other AES countries.
Is there a book recommendation you can give me where I can learn more about this?
You'll have to be more specific. Which part? China under Mao? The Cultural Revolution? The phenomenon of "Maoism"? Socialism with Chinese Characteristics? Modern China's view on the Mao period? These are big topics, i don't know a single book that covers them all.
Some book that explains how Maoism emerged in the West and became the presence that it is today.
https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Library:The_CIA%27s_Shining_Path:_Political_Warfare
https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Essay:Problems_with_Maoism
This might be a good start: https://archive.org/details/critiqueszymanski/mode/1up
Unfortunately it's fairly outdated. When it was written the Soviet Union was still around and China had not yet opened up, and there are a lot of lessons that Marxists over the past four decades have had to draw from what happened to the CPSU, the dissolution of the USSR, and China's successful rise. But this nonetheless explains basically the origins and problems of ultra-left Marxism in the post Chinese revolution era.
It's not focused on Maoism specifically though. For that you'll have to ask someone else for recommendations, i don't have anything right at this moment. I will look into it.
No that's just Marxism-Leninism