hexbear

10417 readers

168 users here now

Hexbear Proposals chapo.chat matrix room.

This will be a place for site proposals and discussion before implementation on the site.
Every proposal will also be mirrored into a pinned post on the hexbear community.

Any other ideas for helping to integrate the two spaces are welcome to be commented here or messaged to me directly.

Within Hexbear Proposals you can see the history of all site proposals and react to them, indicating a vote for or against a proposal.

Sending messages will be restricted to verified and active hexbear accounts older than 1 month with their matrix id in their hexbear user profile.

All top level messages within the channel must be a Proposals (idea for changing the site), Feedback (regarding non-technical aspects of the site, for technical please use https://hexbear.net/c/feedback), or Appeals (regarding admin/moderator actions).

Discussion regarding these will be within nested threads under the post.

To gain matrix verification, all you need to do is navigate to my hexbear userprofile and click the send a secure private message including your hexbear username.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Mutual_Aid discussion post (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

239 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hello users of hexbear:

Due to recent meta posts in our mutual aid community we wanted to open up discussion about the community [email protected]

We will never require explanation or justification from a user asking for aid in the community, and the mod and admin team continue to commit to not featuring an individual's mutual aid request to prevent unfair exposure.

In addition, we will maintain a strict "No critical comments or meta comments" on a mutual aid post.

This post is to discuss the mutual aid community's rule of allowing meta posts: mutual aid as a community, those making posts in it and those commenting on posts.

We are considering removing the exception allowing meta posts but wanted to involve the userbase before committing to a change.

Please comment with any thoughts, feelings, or suggestions regarding this change.

Thank you

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I've done some self crit and no longer think meta posting should be allowed

I think the path forward dealing with potential scams should be the user who thinks someone is scamming should message the mods/admins, they can determine if the accused user should be banned, and then they make a mod post if they choose to ban them

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago

So part of my issue is I feel like lying is conflated with scamming. I'm not going to hold it against someone if they feel the need to lie or embellish facts in order to get something to eat.

The only reason I'd want someone banned is if there is verifiable evidence of them saying shit like "yeah, I'm taking money from these stupid fucks, I don't even need the money."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They've been resisting being seen as arbiters and I don't think they want the extra workload.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago

I agree it'd be extra work, I dont know if there's any way of doing things better than we are right now but wish things could be improved :/