26
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

They're trying to force the workers to strike so they can make their case to the government that the strike is disrupting an essential service and demand that they force the union to accept the terms. Literally the same thing happened a year ago: Postal workers make demands and are willing to negotiate, Canada Post completely refuses to negotiate and locks out the workers, workers strike, postal traffic in Canada grinds to a halt, millions of people and businesses are impacted, Canadian government cites the post office as an "essential service" and uses that to force the union and employer into arbitration even though the employer was the belligerent one and didn't even attempt to negotiate in the first place.

Also, news outlets scapegoated the union for all the delayed mail the last time they went on strike. "How could they do this to Canada? Can't they just accept working like slaves? It's an essential service after all, that means we get to exploit the people doing the job as much as we want and if they strike they're the problem!" No mention of what the union's actual demands were or how the post office itself acted.

Also also, Canada Post is NOT tax funded. It's a government institution that is set up like a normal corporation, but with the government as the shareholder. If that's not an ass backwards way of providing an essential service I don't know what is. Literally the worst of both worlds between private and public ownership.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Also also, Canada Post is NOT tax funded. It's a government institution that is set up like a normal corporation, but with the government as the shareholder.

That's state run services under neoliberalism for you. Best* of all worlds between "state owned" and a private company with the fiduciary responsibility to make profit for the shareholders and fuck over the employees and customers along the way, while also easily able to get additonal taxpayer money to cover the gap between operational costs and revenue.

You also avoid having a bunch of actual government workers, which even in neoliberal hellscapes like Canada have significantly better labour protections than private sector workers.

You can also play off corporate mismanagement and greed driven decisions as "state run services suck" to manufacture consent for even more privatization.

*Obviously not actually the best for working people.

this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
26 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

353 readers
3 users here now

English

This is a community dedicated to Canada and Canadians!

Rules

Links


Français

Il s'agit d'une communauté dédiée au Canada et aux Canadiens !

Règles

Liens Internet


Related Communities / Communautés associées


The community icon is the logo of the Communist Party of Canada, but this community is not affiliated with them. / L'icône de la communauté est le logo du Parti communiste du Canada, mais cette communauté n'est pas affiliée à ce parti.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS