this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8396 readers
116 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There is a segment of very enthusiastic multipolarity supporters who are not concerned with factual accuracy.
Same with the Traore posting that’s been going on recently
Yeah, pretty sure I called out an AI generated one the other day. The delivery was very jarring.
was it the weirdly translated interview where they lip-synced him to (close to) his own voice speaking in perfect english with an inexplicable american accent?
It was an interview, but it was his voice. He was talking about French colonialism and imperialism in general. Nothing that was said I would disagree with, but it sounded like it was an AI dub of his own voice. I'll find the thread and link it
Here we go https://hexbear.net/post/4898859
Your comment made me think of this.
2025 hasn't ended yet we can still hope!
Considering how badly the US airdrops went because, you know, its not a great idea to airdrop shit into one of the most densely populated areas in the world, I would hope they would think this "propaganda" through.
In these cases, my senses tell me "Russian psyop", but who knows?
inb4 "u russiagate liberal"
u russiagate liberal
How dare u
Tbf when was the last time any western media cared about factual accuracy. The only reason we should care about this is because if it comes out it's fake, every asshole in the west will point to it as "evidence" each time they want to claim something China says is fake. But they'll probably do that regardless.
In terms of factual accuracy, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. I'll start caring about the factual accuracy of aid drops when the west starts caring about the factual accuracy of Israel bombing hospitals and killing children.
There’s no need to lie to support our viewpoint
Like someone else in this thread said, this content could very possibly be intended to paint anti-Israel, pro-China westerners as liars.