124
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Unsurprisingly, The Economist’s article peddles a false narrative. Livestreamers and video games are merely the surface of a deeper phenomenon. TikTok and Xiaohongshu thrive only because China’s middle class isn’t impoverished. What makes these platforms persuasive is that they undercut Western myths by contrasting middle-class life in China vs the US.

China has a positive image in the world because it's leading in sustainability, building world-class infrastructure, pioneering tech in emerging fields, and maintaining safe, clean cities at scale. Its foreign policy, while not flawless, is far more benign than the America's. No constant wars. A major ally for developing nations. Growing global brands. Standing firm against a bully in the tariff dispute. Meanwhile, tourists who document their visits, are dismantling claims of a police state or genocide.

https://archive.ph/nWvgg

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago

Didn't have a problem when youtubers like l@owhi were dehumanising them. And before people say oh they're pro taiwan mf was desecrating graves in taiwan. Fuck all these people.

this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
124 points (100.0% liked)

sino

8275 readers
2 users here now

This is a comm for news, information, and discussion on anything China and Chinese related.

Rules:

  1. Follow the Hexbear Code Of Conduct.

  2. Imperialism will result in a ban.

  3. Sinophobic content will be removed.


Newcomer Welcome Wiki


FAQ:


China Guides:


Multimedia:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS