this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
1067 points (96.5% liked)

memes

14835 readers
5357 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Weird, I've seen many analog clocks with Roman numerals but always IV for 4.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's actually called the "clockmakers four" or "watchmakers four." it's a thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

Yeah I looked it up and saw it is a thing, and it's interesting. I wonder if the clock I'm thinking of was just a really cheap one that was labeled as you'd expect based on Roman numerals or whether some just didn't follow it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago

To be fair, Google searching Roman numerals clocks give you about a 50/50 distribution.

I wasn't aware of this either and I suspect we're not alone. It's not highly noticeable and if there's a 50-50 chance won't even see it...

[–] [email protected] -4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

False. I had a clock that used IIII instead.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago

Your clock having it doesn't change that mine didn't.