this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
337 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

70162 readers
3554 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"The exercise was held from May 8 to 9, 2024, at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) in Laurel, Maryland, and at a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) site in Denver, Colorado."

Article refers to a PDF of the report it's based on:

https://www.jhuapl.edu/sites/default/files/2025-04/Space-Weather-TTX-Report-Summary-v3-FINAL.pdf

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm glad this threat is at least starting to be taken seriously. As an amateur radio operator, I got incredibly interested in how the weather on the sun affects radio propagation and power management here on Earth.

Better a CME than an EMP just simply because there is at least some time to prepare for a massive CME. Whereas an EMP has absolutely no warning whatsoever.

In the event of a massive CME off-grid homes and buildings are likely to fare much better because they are not connected to the power grid. The problem comes with long transmission lines where incredibly large charge differentials can build up over distance. shorter wires can't build up nearly the same amount of charge differential.

Edit: I feel it's important to mention that grid tie systems are going to be just as vulnerable as on grid because you still have the grid actually physically connected to the building.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

As an amateur radio operator, The high bands get wiped first! 80, 160, not so much (no ionosphere? ground wave still works. Easy to throw up a long wire ... afterward). Hams (esp. ARES) will become VERY IMPORTANT for a LONG time when it happens. Field Day is a good way to prep for aftermath. (Gear can go into metal containers to escape parts damage until afterward.) Portable generators (best without a lot of electronics on them) will be needed to re-charge the batteries!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's worth noting that even though a building might have solar, the systems usually disable themselves in the event of a blackout to prevent back feeding into the grid.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's known as a grid tie system and my edit mentions that. The only way it's going to help is if the grid is physically disconnected from the building as in the wire is not connected to the building at any point.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unless I'm missing something here, thats what an LVD should do, and anyone grid-connected with solar should have.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

During a normal power outage, you're right. That does keep you isolated on your own island. But in a case like this, the voltage is likely to spike to incredibly high levels on wires that aren't meant to carry it and cause arcing and possibly fires. That's why you want to be physically disconnected.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The breakers at transformers in each neighborhood would surely trip before frying a house I would think.

They go whenever a tree comes down near our street anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

The voltages involved are more likely to cause the transformers to explode rather than just tripping the breakers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Got it, at that point (extremely high voltage) you'd need suppression at the panel. Which I would hope people have inline, but not expect like an LVD.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

With a high enough voltage the air will ionized and the power will literally jump over many protection mechanisms. Also it can cause certain dialetrics (electrically isolating materials) to break as they all have a breaking point.

An extreme enough event can be way beyond even the biggest of tolerances of safety systems as there is some distance between where the outside end and the inside end are wired into the system and that distance is chosen with certain maximum voltages tolerances in mind which are finite and beyond those design voltages and as I said the air will just ionize becoming conductive and many isolators will just blow up.

So it makes sense that when a massive electromagnetic storm is inducing electric currents along tens or hundreds of miles long wires, the only guaranteed safe system is to not even have a cable from the grid coming into your house.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

At that point, that grid connection will be the least of anyone's worries. The storm in Quebec in... 1990? Ish. tripped breakers, and shut things down for like a day.

A storm on the scale youre talking about I am pretty sure would wipe out satellites (maybe even take them down due to atmospheric drag?), impact cables other than power like copper laid for internet and phone, etc. Grid-connected power or not you'd be severely impacted and potentially at risk.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

Oh yeah, a large enough solar mass ejection in such a direction that it would directly hit planet Earth would be extremely bad.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

That wouldn't be an off grid building then.