politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
IMO the plan would be a complete rewrite of the political system. It's clear that the current system is based purely on the honorsystem, and needs to be redone in a way that rewards multiple parties, with actual consequenses for the capitalowners whenever they commit a crime.
A revolution doesn't have to end in just one ruling party or idealogy. It also doesn't have to end with killing all republicans. The denazifying of Germany didn't mean everyone who had supported the nazi party had to be killed. A lot of ressources were focused on reeducation instead, and so far, it seems to have worked really well. The hardliners who directly helped the fascists will obviously have to be punished for treason against the country's democratic foundation, but that doesn't mean everyone who voted for Trump has to be punished. Most people are just ignorant, brainwashed and scared, because they've been pumped full with disinformation for the last 50 years.
But the absolutely most important part of all this, is to remove the system that rewards corrupt politicians. If a politician is openly corrupt, openly works to undermine their voters' interests, they're still more likely to get reelected than be replaced, because the party decides who gets to run, and the voting options are so few, and when people are brainwashed like they are, they'd rather vote against their own interest, than vote for their percieved enemy. So how do you get rid of that?
I'm not going to write a whole manifesto here, so I'm going to stop here, but my point is, that this can absolutely end without rounding up anyone who doesn't agree, and it can be fixed, but it needs a complete overhaul of the incredibly broken system in the USA, and it absolutely also needs hard punishment for the people who directly aided in the rise of fascism.
Then you see the real issue which is not that there are fascists in our society, in a liberal society those will always exist one way or another. The bigger issue is the bipartisan system. But I don’t think we need violence to get what you want. You need democrats that are not just corporate puppets. But the dems talk big about changing things and as soon as they get in power they work real hard to maintain the status quo.
So what would be your solution to convince a whole party with a monopoly on the whole left-ish spectrum of idealogy, a party who has proven themselves entirely corrupt time and time again, just with different owners than the republicans, to willingly let go of the power, money and influence to people who they fundamentally disagree with on almost every single point. That requires a revolution. A revolution that could theoretically be peaceful, but has in practice not happened a single time in history.
The answer is a grassroots movement to vote for independents and candidates that explicitly do not take corpo money.
Look at the Republican Party, it is an unrecognizable entity these days, remade in the image of Trump and taken over entirely by MAGA. But at first the party rejected him pretty strongly. And MAGA is just the Tea Party with a mustache and a Jesus piece. All he had to do was convince people to vote for him, and once in power he applied pressure to all his opponents to get them to fold.
Dems need to realize that they do not need mountains of cash to win elections. Trump ran circles around Kamala with less money. He beat Clinton with about half the money. He took over a party that rejected him in his first go. If progressives wanna know how to remake the Democratic Party they really need to study how Trump moved and take the same risks he did. And of course you also need someone with charisma, which I don’t think they have right now.