this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
106 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

2645 readers
302 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When all else fails, the scare tactics return.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if some of those apps are using payment processors outside the EU to circumvent this.

You misunderstood. It's based on the country they are operating in (not where they are based). If they take payments from EU citizens, they are bound by EU law.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

So theoretically that sounds great, but practically it would have to be Apple to kick those apps from the platform if the apps are not abiding EU law, or how does that work?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If the app developer uses non-Apple payment processor, those refunds would be handled by that payment processor. The potencial app removal would be handled by Apple or alternative store it's installed from.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yet still, is it then so wrong to warn a user beforehand that the payment processor isn't going to be Apple? I'm not sure what your idea is that the EU should do here? No warning from anyone seems to be a recipe for scamming.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It implies that Apple payment system is the only "private and secure payment system". Which is false, as we covered every single payment processor operating in the EU (as in allowed to take payments from EU citizens) is private and secure as that's a requirement for them to even be able to operate in the first place.

If the warning was "App uses external payment processor". That would have been a different story, no?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

No it wouldn't need to be Apple.

If a payment processor won't comply, you can ask for a chargeback at your bank, and if it keeps happening, the payment processor can be blocked from accepting EU payments at all.