this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
197 points (95.0% liked)

World News

46565 readers
3762 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Denmark is reconsidering its 40-year ban on nuclear power in a major policy shift for the renewables-heavy country.

The Danish government will analyse the potential benefits of a new generation of nuclear power technologies after banning traditional nuclear reactors in 1985, its energy minister said.

The Scandinavian country is one of Europe’s most renewables-rich energy markets and home to Ørsted, the world’s biggest offshore wind company. More than 80% of its electricity is generated from renewables, including wind, biofuels and solar, according to the International Energy Agency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (4 children)

Nuclear is less expensive and more scalable than solar, wind, hydro.

It does not boil the planet like fossil fuels.

Yes it takes time and money to set up, but that's a short term cost.

This is assumed to be widely known, so critical questions that don't take that into account are assumed to be either in bad faith or laziness.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

How is it less expensive then solar??? Are you using solar panels from 1970?

It has always been highly subsidized. And there is also cost to keep it working. Fuel rods and people... And if you include "persistent waste storage costs" and force them to pay money into a fund that will be used in case of a rare catastrophy, combined with the prediction of solar getting cheaper and cheaper, no one with the intention to gain money would invest in that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago

Nuclear power is slow and rigid. And it is absolutely uneconomical in the long run.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Nuclear is less expensive and more scalable than solar, wind, hydro.

It's neither.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

More scalable is hilarious. They take like 10 years to build and cost 18 billion dollars to get 1GW steady state.

Meanwhile, we can whip out 1GW of solar in 2yrs for 2 billion, and do it in modular sections. You don't have steady state, but you could build solar out to compete with enough battery and high voltage transmission lines, with basically zero nuclear hurdles. It would cost, but it is viable now and much faster, and that's with current tech. Batteries and panels are just getting cheaper and better.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The LCOE for nuclear is substantially higher than wind and solar. It’s not just upfront costs.