this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
198 points (95.0% liked)

World News

46565 readers
3811 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Denmark is reconsidering its 40-year ban on nuclear power in a major policy shift for the renewables-heavy country.

The Danish government will analyse the potential benefits of a new generation of nuclear power technologies after banning traditional nuclear reactors in 1985, its energy minister said.

The Scandinavian country is one of Europe’s most renewables-rich energy markets and home to Ørsted, the world’s biggest offshore wind company. More than 80% of its electricity is generated from renewables, including wind, biofuels and solar, according to the International Energy Agency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

hydro and big batteries make sense as they soak up the excess solar and wind, but how does nuclear help with this?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Nuclear helps when you have a very bad drought and very little wind for a long time. Bad doldrums, or perhaps big fires changing wind patterns during a hot summer. Certain parts of the world may need to rethink certain forms of power generation as the climate begins to change at an accelerated pace. Our reservoirs and dams in western Canada and the western US are already below historic averages, and we've used hydro for decades and decades.

Nuclear is a very consistent, base load source. Expensive, but very reliable, and most importantly, cleaner and safer than coal or methane ("natural gas") generators in the event you need to meet extraordinary demand all of a sudden.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Our reservoirs and dams in western Canada and the western US are already below historic averages, and we’ve used hydro for decades and decades

It's funny you mention that because this just came up today:

Tasmania’s hydro power hits record lows as trading strategy shifts from baseload to firming

https://reneweconomy.com.au/tasmanias-hydro-power-hits-record-lows-as-trading-strategy-shifts-from-baseload-to-firming/

The question is if nuclear power ends up being a non-used source of energy unless in extreme situations like

very bad drought and very little wind for a long time

then is it an appropriate solution? If it's only for a short time then it sounds like gas would be better

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, weather is shifting a lot. Methane is really bad to build as any leaks (and they do leak) release gas that accelerates climate change way faster than carbon. Nuclear is a reliable source for a long time. I suspect that many of the world's hydro dams will become less useful as things deteriorate. Perhaps some can be replaced by geothermal, or solar/wind/battery, but for places that are in geographically disadvantaged locations, nuclear is a great option.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago

Absolutely not, in no way is natural gas better. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcoN2bdACGA Please watch this. This is Why Trump is threatening Greenland.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 hours ago

Kyle Hill has a great video explaining this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcoN2bdACGA Please watch this. This is Why Trump is threatening Greenland.