Slop.

497 readers

301 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 6 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Magacommunism Leader Jackson Hinkle speaks with Emerald Mine Owner Errol Musk, Elon's dad (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

They praise Elon for like a solid 30 minutes. Hinkle says he loves everything about Elon except for working with Netanyahu. Errol Musk describes Israel as an ideal society, says that Israel is "civilized". Both say that they hate the South Africa ANC.

"secured relief for Gaza" is in reference to Errol Musk claiming that he gave Elon's Starlink to Hamas.

https://xcancel.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1920948402424090709

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know the exact details of what happened. I'm saying what Haz Al-din claimed his intentions were. He says that he told his followers to join CPUSA to "change the party line" (ie takeover) and then the party began to ban people who associated with him.

The reason why I told my followers to join the CPUSA is because having disagreements with the ideological, strategic or even programmatic line with the party is not sufficient grounds for abandoning it.

As Stalin pointed out, the Communist way is to submit to the will of the majority of the party, however erroneous it may be regarded by you individually.

The point is that through internal discussions and dialogue, you may have an opportunity to argue on behalf of the correctness of your position, in order to persuade others and ultimately change the party line.

This is the point of democratic centralism: To make the party as an institution responsive to changes and nuances concerning the will of the majority, while simultaneously enforcing submission to the outcome of that will.

So even when the party decided to undemocratically and unconstitutionally pursue a policy of trying to ban members affiliated with 'Infrared,' I continued to tell my followers to hold out, to stay in the party and follow its rules and procedures, and conceal their views.

https://xcancel.com/InfraHaz/status/1799983883410100516

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

yeah and I'm telling you the exact details of what happened. screaming slurs in a meeting isn't how you take over the old party.