this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
55 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8386 readers
168 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So there's this thing people do, it's harmless enough, but it also sort of hints at a completely incoherent style of thinking. It is absolutely unfair to judge people by random shit they write casually, after all I write like 3 geeked out baboons stacked atop one and other and yet I am a noble and refined rat.

Nonetheless I'm a judgy shit so I do. Ok so the thing? It's when people use a quote or situation from fiction as a predictor of what will happen in reality. A concrete example from earlier today paraphrased:

p1: I think blah blah thing will happen

p2: Ah but remember men in black? a person is reasonable, people are dumb panicky animals

me: teakettle noises

The causality is utterly confused, MiB cannot be used as evidence, it is written that way because the writer wanted a character to say that. It's possible a writer wanted a character to say that because the writer believed it to be true, but it's also possible that it was included for many other reasons.

screeeeeeeeeee

Anyway, share your thoughts. Also your own ridiculous rhetoric irritations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Lord of the Flies is one of the biggest ones of these. MFer heard about people surviving collectively after a shipwreck, wrote a book about how humans can't do that, and now people cite it like it's a historical document

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I literally was taught this book alongside 1984 and Brave New World. It was like a whole anticommunist book unit

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Back when I was taught they did 1984, Brave New World, Handmaids Tale and Clockwork Orange back to back. It was miserable.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's really funny to me is that all these books are just about how terrible and miserable England is (and I guess the anglosphere more generally re: Handmaids Tale) and then projecting that onto the USSR and communism. Like yes, 1984 is terrifying-- it's about the UK government though, not the fucking Soviets.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Pretty much, Clockwork Orange is borderline unreadable with its made up slang too. Can't believe these books are so highly regarded.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In most disasters, people cooperate and join together to get through it. Even all the shit happening during Hurricane Katrina, people were helping each other with the burger brain property rights fuckwads causing the most problems (i.e. threatening to shoot """"looters"""").

I think it's white settlers who are incapable of working for the greater good as seen with covid.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah that is what the book is based on.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The book was written a decade before this though.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh must be another incident or I am wrong about the order, but I could have sworn it was based on a similar event.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

It wasn't really an incident, but a writing trend - Lord of the Flies was a rebuke to a very colonial fiction that had become popular about white christians becoming stranded and thriving due to their civilisation and cultural superiority (and the book Coral Island specifically). Golding thought that was horseshit and wrote about kids getting stranded and then acting like kids instead of white Christian saviours.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

I think you're thinking of another fictional book called The Coral Island. Lord of the Flies sort of parodies it

Golding was inspired to write the ‘real’ story of what would happen if boys were stranded on an island – ‘in Lord of the Flies he had written Coral Island in reverse

https://william-golding.co.uk/lord-flies-coral-island

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

People always miss the real point of that book: that british "people" are savages

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago

I am building a hell specifically for people who think Lord of the Flies has anything useful to teach us about the nature of society and cooperation.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's also a crap book. Read it as a kid, it sucks

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's one of my favorite books! :cri:

But mostly because I like survival/wilderness horror, not because I think it's an accurate portrayal of human nature.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Do you know the hatchet books? I loved them as a child.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

Yup! Read Hatchet and Brian's Winter both as a kid.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Nooooooo not my beanmar!!