this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
15 points (94.1% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

965 readers
2 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Was he a brutal dictator, or was he (somehow) not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm absolutely not defending him, but rather critiquing the Western obsession with black dictators. You really took "very imperfect" out of its context.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Very imperfect implies there were redeemable aspects or traits.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even if that was true, there's no need to apply a dictionary to two words of my text, all the while ignoring the rest of it. I'm telling you what the intended meaning is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You didn't say any of this until after I heavily criticized you, and you can't blame me when you seemed to be apologizing for one of the worst dictators. Your gaslighting isn't helping you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, you should.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fair point, but he was... err pretty horrible, ngl LMAO

Edit: I mean, I agree there is a Western obsession, but he was certainly "up there" In terms of evil. He also was staunchly anti-communist, though did it with a "Black nationalist" veneer at times (obviously it wasn't, but you know how it goes).