this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
395 points (86.5% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

1661 readers
604 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

reading that article, I mostly read that's it's debated and that what the famine were weaponized. Also, commentary on communism being the cause of them is largely dependent on the critic eye

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Uh... Who the hell cares about any of that? Whether the Soviets shirked their responsibility to keep their (forcibly incorporated, mind you) subjects fed due to malice or malice-fueled incompetence matters about as much as whether the IDF is mass-murdering Gazans because they want to mass murder Gazans or because they're bombing any target their shitty AI gives them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

yeah so… we're talking about weather to put all the blame on communism in general. Communism is an ideology, not a government ?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

The OP says communists, not communism so I'm not sure what brought that on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Its debated by russian historical revisionism Most communist crimed have not seen wide coverage in english. This is why it's not okay to fly swastika but cool to fly hammer and cycle.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You can fly the hammer and sickle the same way you can fly the US flag, or the Chinese, or UK, or Turkish flags.

The difference being having a flag under which atrocities were done, vs having a flag that represents the reason behind those atrocities.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Uhhh... Who's going to tell them what the official national flag of Germany was from 1935 to 1945?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yes. Who's going to tell you that the black swastika in a white circle in a red rectangle was the official flag of Nazi Germany's government? This is the flag "under which atrocities were done", i.e. under which the Holocaust happened and under which Germany plunged the world into WWII. If your argument is that this isn't "a flag under which atrocities were done" but rather "a flag that represents the reason behind those atrocities", then why doesn't the hammer and sickle represent the reason behind the Holodomor? Behind all the other extreme atrocities committed by the USSR? Otherwise, if your argument is that it is a flag under which atrocities were done like the hammer and sickle, and you're saying the hammer and sickle are fine to fly, then what's the difference with flying the flag of Nazi Germany? I don't think either of these despicable flags should be flown, to be clear, but I'm asking why you take exception here based on your own argument (or, if you don't take exception, what the hell is wrong with you).

Basically what I'm saying is that your rationale of "having a flag under which atrocities were done, vs having a flag that represents the reason behind those atrocities" makes zero sense and is comparing functionally the same thing.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, Stalinism wasn't communism, so that's a fair point.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Reminds me of the "real capitalism has never been tried" that right-wing libertarians retreat to when you point out the massive flaws which occur under capitalism – namely that those ills are the product of bastardizing capitalism with government regulation ("crony capitalism"). Where of course they get to dictate exactly what "real capitalism" is against the consensus of historians and economists– usually pure laissez-faire capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

That is a pretty wild generalisation to make. From me claiming one person that pretended to be a communist wasn't to somehow me being a... Soviet fanboy or something? Stalin and Mao both committed atrocities, pretending to be something they aren't. China keeps doing it to this day, as does DPRK. Lenin wasn't a saint folks over at .ml pretend he was either. People get corrupted by power, it happens depressingly often under any political ideology.