this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
445 points (86.5% liked)
Late Stage Capitalism
1661 readers
693 users here now
A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.
A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.
RULES:
1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.
2 No Trolling
3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.
4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.
5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.
6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes. Who's going to tell you that the black swastika in a white circle in a red rectangle was the official flag of Nazi Germany's government? This is the flag "under which atrocities were done", i.e. under which the Holocaust happened and under which Germany plunged the world into WWII. If your argument is that this isn't "a flag under which atrocities were done" but rather "a flag that represents the reason behind those atrocities", then why doesn't the hammer and sickle represent the reason behind the Holodomor? Behind all the other extreme atrocities committed by the USSR? Otherwise, if your argument is that it is a flag under which atrocities were done like the hammer and sickle, and you're saying the hammer and sickle are fine to fly, then what's the difference with flying the flag of Nazi Germany? I don't think either of these despicable flags should be flown, to be clear, but I'm asking why you take exception here based on your own argument (or, if you don't take exception, what the hell is wrong with you).
Basically what I'm saying is that your rationale of "having a flag under which atrocities were done, vs having a flag that represents the reason behind those atrocities" makes zero sense and is comparing functionally the same thing.