this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
647 points (98.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

11532 readers
1980 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

I fully believe the single most important thing to any conservative male that espouses their NEED for a pickup over taking the train and walking two blocks is that they can't purposefully run over people on a train/metro and look big and intimidating.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This is why we call them "gender-affirming vehicles," or "emotional support trucks."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

My wife calls them "tiny penis trucks". If there's a bunch all together, it's a "tiny penis parade"

I like the gender affirming vehicle though. Not too many women desperate to drive a truck that never touches dirt or cargo.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I believe that autocorrect changed the word "causes" to "spouses" on you without you noticing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I'd say it was meant to be "espouses"

espouse

verb

  1. To become/get married to.
  2. To accept, support, or take on as one’s own (an idea or a cause).
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's definitely a better fit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Well, I'm glad you guys can interpret what I meant!

Yes I meant "espouses" but my autocorrect dropped the first "E" and I didn't proofread well enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Substitute the word "causes" for the word "spouses," and it makes sense.