A Comm for Historymemes

2510 readers

367 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.
No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.
Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.
Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

441

Bearistotle's wisdom (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Your example is incorrect.

All cats are peanut butter (c is a subset of p)
some peanut butter are dogs (p intersects d, or, d is a subset of p)
some cats are dogs (c and d intersect, or, d is a subset of c)

The first two do not make the third.

You can have:

c is a subset of p,
d and p intersect,
The section of p that intersects with d does not contain any c

To fix this, reverse the first statement.

All peanut butter are cats (p is a subset of c)
some peanut butter are dogs (p intersects d, or, d is a subset of p)
some cats are dogs (c and d intersect, or, d is a subset of c)

Any portion of d that intersects with p (some p is d) must also be c (since all p is in c). Hence some c, but not all c, is in the portion of p that intersects with d (some c is d).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oops. I fucked up lol. I changed it with your edit :p

Mental note: don't do syllogisms at 1am.