this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
1071 points (96.9% liked)

Comic Strips

16304 readers
2133 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago (4 children)

There are several people in the comments saying they have to use 27 Feb 2013 because they work with people all over the world. I’m really confused - what does that solve that 2013-02-13 does not? I know that not every language spells months the English way so “Dec” or “May” aren’t universal. Is there some country that regularly puts year day month that would break using ISO 8601 or RFC 3339?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think learning all abbreviations for different months in different languages is more complicated than just learning that the time is sorted from largest to smallest unit.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It solves the familiarity problem, when getting somebody to do something by a date they readily understand at a glance takes precedence over making everybody in the world change a lifelong habit.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

27 Feb 2013 is unambiguous- regardless of where you're from or how you write your dates, you can't confuse 2013 for the month or day, you can't confuse Feb for a day or week, and if you can't figure 27 out, then we have bigger problems!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

2013-02-27 is also unambiguous unless you’re aware of a country that uses year day month, is not?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

2013-02-03 though. Someone would fuck it up

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I used to work for a company that agreed with you, well at least some clown in management did. Even though it was an Australian company, at least part of the problem was we had an office in Manila, and they speak "American English" which seemed to include the awful date system too. We dealt with a lot of files being issued to clients / received from vendors etc. Because the "official" system used those fucked up dates, everyone ran their own secondary sets of data folders in / out with everything done in ISO dates so you could actually sort it properly.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Which I was the justification used when my work decided to use 2025-May-01.

It’s close enough to the iso date that nobody will be confused but with that 1 extra layer of security blanket to separate months and days.

Of course, that does ruin sorting, so I think it was a bit silly, nobody has ever used yyyyddmm so it’s all a bit theoretical to me.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

27 Feb is no more or less ambiguous than 02-27. The problems are when you choose a proper example, like 03/02