this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
165 points (94.1% liked)

Collapse

769 readers
314 users here now

This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.


Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.


RULES

1 - Remember the human

2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source

3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.

4 - No low effort, high volume and low relevance posts.


Related lemmys:

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

Uhhh pretty sure we didn’t have a nuclear reactor meltdown.

…but we were in Afghanistan until a humiliating withdrawal a few years ago…

Shit

[–] [email protected] 43 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, we've long outdone Chernobyl. Industrial pollution, oil spills, microplastics, regular plastics, PFAS, overfishing, habitat destruction... The modern ecological disaster caused by the US alone, before you even add in the rest of the planet, is so unfathomably large in scale that honestly it doesn't even warrant a comparison to Chernobyl.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Chernobyl was such a uniquely singularly destructive event that also contributed to financially cracking the USSR - Russia is still spending enormous amounts of money on it to this day. The nuclear incidents in US history and many other energy related disasters were terrible and have had major consequences, but Chernobyl, again as a singular event, is without parallel.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The US releases more radiation entirely uncontrolled over every five year period than the Chernobyl event.

Chernobyl is over exaggerated. Coal power has done more damage, and continues to do more damage than the totality of all nuclear incidents, and it does so every 7 years.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Chernobyl is exaggerated

Ask the dead from Pripyat what their opinion on that is

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Ask the 20-50x more cancer patients downwind (up to 50 miles) from any coal mine or plant what they think of a few thousand dead.

More people have died from coal related radiation related cancers than lived in the entirety of pripyat.

Nuclear, by the numbers is the safest power source next to solar. The rmb reactors of Chernobyl, per mWh, are safer than any implementation of coal that has ever existed or will ever exist.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Mile_Island_accident

Not counting nuclear reactor accidents and other man-made disasters like Bhopal.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 14 hours ago

Three mile island isn't comparable to Chernobyl, particularly not in the context of how it impacts a nations stability.

Chernobyl cost around $900 billion, inflation adjusted, and the cost is rising because it's controlled, not resolved.

Adjusted for inflation, three mile island cost around $5 billion.

To put it in scale, it'd be like the US having a disaster that cost around $7.5 trillion to resolve today. It's the type of economic shock that can make nations fail.

Bhopal, while a terrible disaster, cost the US nothing beyond the cost of not extraditing someone.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

A poof of radioactive steam got loose at Three Mile Island. To this day, no studies have found a correlation of higher cancer rates, neither among the people on the ground, nor among the people living in the area. And no one was hurt on Day 1.

Know why the incident is top of mind for folks thinking on nuclear disasters? The China Syndrome, a movie about a catastrophic plant meltdown came out less than 3 weeks before. People shit kittens. I was only 8, but I still remember the panic.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 15 hours ago

These incidents were decades ago. Awful, but as such don’t parallel the relationship between Chernobyl and the collapse of the USSR.