privacy

Ah yes, the "splurdge" part of the article, a word everyone knows as a very technical term that's used for filling in for an inability to articulate an actual line of logic. Instead of logic, just explain that "I don't like the conclusion of the article, so it must be wrong somehow even though I can't explain why."

It's also important for people to chime in that an article must be wrong because it just "feels wrong". Of course don't actually provide any reasoning for it, because why would that be necessary?

Don't forget how useful it is to ask a question, completely ignoring that the article addresses it. Don't even bring it up in the questioning. When someone points that out, then the best strategy is to lash out at them, because they were such a big meanie by pointing out the obvious problem of not reading the article.

Lemmy communities are all about feelings, not information!

Oh, also I took a screenshot of your comment because I knew you were going to edit it.