this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
1365 points (98.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

7471 readers
1368 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, you see. The man has a penis, therefore he is at higher risk of violence than women.

Wait, no. It's the opposite.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cis men experience more of every non-sexual form of violence than cis women on average, to the point where they experience more incidents of overall violence.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The fun part is when you start digging into where that violence is coming from....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For amybody experiencing violence, how is that important?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

To identify the source of the problem? Address it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Sure, but that's not the perspective of someone who is experiencing violence.

Someone said "men are more likely to experience violence" and the fact that this violence is also coming from men doesn't change much. There is no 'men convention' where it's put up to votes the way men collectively will act - unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

Technically, we can do both. This is not an either or situation. I feel that the awareness train is rolling well for the victims (and should not be stopping), we are needing to now focus upstream so hurt people stop hurting people as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

So, did you bring this up as a problem where a solution should occur, or just asking to feel sorry for them? To the person experiencing violence, sure, we could recommend therapy, or be empathetic, but if we do nothing to address the root cause it won't stop it at best,and at worst we start victim blaming.

This post is more about the cause not wanting to understand they're the issue, and you brought in another issue caused by the same toxic masculinity, then got defensive when that was pointed out.

To want empathy for your problems is natural. If you just want empathy and not a solution, there is a time and place for that too. However what you are doing here is either trying to derail the conversation, or making it about something that wasn't the original convo(usually done by someone making it about themselves, but I don't know you enough to make that specific of an accusation).

If you want to fight for mens rights and proper treatment, that's wonderful. However doing it by attacking/derailing women complaining about the same issues is not. It's closer to when women's suffrage movement wanted only freedom for white women.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

and you brought in another issue caused by the same toxic masculinity

To be clear, someone else did.

The fact that someone answered to "actually males are more likely to experience violence" with "eh, but go look who does that violence" prompted my comment.

And it almost sounds like somehow the focus switched from the victim to the cause, when the victims are men. This is the cause why I decided to comment. Almost like violence and protection of who experiences matters depending on who is experiencing it, as if there would be any difference from a woman or a man experiencing violence, whether it is from a man or a woman.

However what you are doing here is either trying to derail the conversation, or making it about something that wasn't the original convo

If this is your argument, it is a weak one, because I specifically commented in a child thread about this very topic, in response to a very dismissive comment (from my POV). There is no conversation that I am hijacking nor it was me who brought up violence on men on the first place.

However doing it by attacking/derailing women complaining about the same issues is not

Thankfully neither happened.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago

I'd like to make a longer response but something here at work blew up, so I'll just say fair. I don't completely agree that there wasn't some sort of derailing, but you weren't the one who did it, and it can be argued the top level comment was the reason for it anyway.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A lot of trans women who possess penises are at extreme risk of violence from men.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And trans men experience struggles with an epidemic of both sexual abuse and domestic violence, which is basically not studied at all.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes, but they are still women, and I specifically was referring to men with penises.

Checkmate, atheists.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

I know, I was just being the required-by-law annoying leftist.