this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
253 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

69247 readers
5301 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

That's why they're calling it "AI".

That's not why. They're calling it AI because it is AI. AI doesn't mean sapient or conscious.

Edit: look at this diagram if you're still unsure:

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In the general population it does. Most people are not using an academic definition of AI, they are using a definition formed from popular science fiction.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

You have that backwards. People are using the colloquial definition of AI.

"Intelligence" is defined by a group of things like pattern recognition, ability to use tools, problem solving, etc. If one of those definitions are met then the thing in question can be said to have intelligence.

A flat worm has intelligence, just very little of it. An object detection model has intelligence (pattern recognition) just not a lot of it. An LLM has more intelligence than a basic object detection model, but still far less than a human.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, that's the point. You'd think they could have, at least, looked into a dictionary at some point in the last 2 years. But nope, everyone else is wrong. A round of applause for the paragons of human intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The I implies intelligence; of which there is none because it's not sentient. It's intentionally deceptive because it's used as a marketing buzzword.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You might want to look up the definition of intelligence then.

By literal definition, a flat worm has intelligence. It just didn't have much of it. You're using the colloquial definition of intelligence, which uses human intelligence as a baseline.

I'll leave this graphic here to help you visualize what I mean:

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please do post this graphic again, I don't think I've quite grasped it yet

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, yes. I forgot that LLM have creativity, abstract thinking and understanding. Thanks for the reminder. /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

It's not a requirement to have all those things. Having just one is enough to meet the definition. Such as problem solving, which LLMs are capable of doing.