this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
494 points (99.2% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

2404 readers
1256 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As often said, no academic argues Jesus was not a historical figure. Only militant terminally online atheists do.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm not talking about whether Jesus existed or not. The bible is not a historic accord is what I'm saying.

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Still, Simon/Peter could just as fine be as real as the person historically named Jesus. Assuming Jesus wasn't talking to imaginary friends all day.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 1 points 1 week ago

That’s not their point. Their point is the Bible isn’t a reliable source.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 3 points 1 week ago

Got you, no argument against that