Original post: aus.social (Mastodon)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

the way i see it, "folks" can refer to a more traditional group of people, most likely rural, and you wouldn't call nobles or people of other high status "folks".

but also i doubt people think it is problematic; it's just a quirk of the English language that "chat" emerged basically out of nowhere with the closest analogue being "audience".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    the way i see it, "folks" can refer to a more traditional group of people, most likely rural, and you wouldn't call nobles or people of other high status "folks".

    But you'd call nobles or high status people "chat"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I meant more that chat implies it could be literally anyone because it's anonymous. Like when the game's developer or some guy with 100k followers suddenly drops in to a little guy's stream. You wouldn't know unless they announced themselves lol

  • source
  • parent