this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
94 points (98.0% liked)

Fedibridge

554 readers
4 users here now

A community to organize and discuss the growth of the fediverse as a whole

Related communities

Megathreads

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I have observed that you generally cannot have nuanced discussions on a myriad of topics on lemmy as there is a "right" and "wrong" stance in the eyes of the majority here.

Does this mean that you believe in nothing? Because I can't really interpret it any other way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Im not really sure how that is the only way you interpreted what I said there...

I believe in all sorts of things. I haven't really gotten into many political conversations on Lemmy. I have simply seen in other threads I was reading through that the grand majority has their stance and anyone that doesn't necessarily agree with that stance tends to get downvoted or banned pretty quickly. Not exactly a place of thoughtful debate. More of one group dogpiling a minority opinion until it's gone.

Sorta like a self sustained echo chamber or something. If anyone comes in with an outside perspective the horde attacks until it's dead or leaves. Just makes most of the threads kinda boring because it's a bunch of people all agreeing on everything.

It's fine if that's how you wanna live but I prefer talking to people I don't necessarily agree with from time to time. Expand my horizons and view topics from different perspectives. Kinda a major part of the human experience.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We could quibble about where the 'moderate' stance actually is, but i find it more refreshing to debate the nuances of differing leftist stances rather than deal with brain-dead reactionary takes that i find in the typical reddit community

I don't think most Americans realize just how rightward their politics have been pushed over even the last 15 years

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

American moderates are center right. In most places. You would be correct that America skews right in genral.

As I am an American I am measuring myself based on America's politics spectrum. I seem to piss off people on both sides of the isle.

I am pro gun. Pro choice. Pro universal health care. I don't care about sexual orientation you are. I don't care what consenting adults are doing in the privacy of their own homes. I honestly don't care about gay marriage or if someone wants to marry their car. I think we didn't separate church and state enough. Pro free speech.

Mostly I think the government should leave everyone the fuck alone.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a pretty disingenuous way to categorize moderates/centrists and you know it.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Took about 30 seconds

And I would feel fairly confident that the commenter was a woman because attacking someones personality (that they don't know at all) is typically done by women

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

lmao good work rat-salute-2

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was this in their history? I can't find it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Tyvm. Fuck this troll, can't wait to watch his smug ass rolled back to RTown

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I stand by that comment. It's missing some context from the rest of that thread and other comments left by other people but still.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't worry, I read the context, and I still think it's plenty misogynistic.

I can see why you might "get shit on by both sides"

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My brother used to call me glow worm when were growing up because I was so pale that I would "light up the room" when I got out of bed at night to piss when we still shared a room as kids.

We have different dads and his father was Mexican while mine was white as could possibly be.

So I'm used to being called a worm. But not a pathetic one. Usually just a glow worm.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i didn't ask for your life story

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And I didn't tell you to kill yourself like you did to me multiple times. Shit happens.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

i never told you to kill yourself. i said i hope you get hit by a bus. crypto bigots like you deserve to be worm food.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Shit you're right my bad. You didn't tell me to kill myself. You just told me I should die. That is technically different. My b.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So you do believe that the positions you hold are correct, that they are "right" rather than "wrong"? Otherwise, why would you hold them?

It's fine if that's how you wanna live but I prefer talking to people I don't necessarily agree with from time to time. Expand my horizons and view topics from different perspectives. Kinda a major part of the human experience.

I've been on this planet for nearly half a century, so I've already heard all the so-called "arguments" that are supposed to counter the things I believe. They're all garbage, and they never change.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So after half a century of being alive you have just decided there's nothing else to learn and nothing you could be mistaken about. No reason to talk things out and hear others' opinions. Because you are the oldest wisest human being ever.

I (not the person you answered to) do believe I am right on the opinions I hold, but I'm not certain of it. So I read, and I discourse, and I consider other points of view, in case my opinions could have been mistaken. That won't mean I will suddenly consider "hey maybe the Nazis were right killing all those people they hated". There will be some aspects where I won't budge in my opinion, but most things are nuanced and harder to draw a line for than the nazi example.

But then again, why would what I say matter, all arguments opposed to you are garbage and wrong.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

What was the last thing that changed your opinion on something you would consider a substantial influence on how you interact with the world?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I believe that the opinions I hold currently are the best versions of the opinions I've come to have over the course of my life. I used to have very different opinions when I was younger and I am sure many of my opinions on things will shift as I get older. It's not as black and white/ right and wrong as you are implying. Sure there are some things that have an objectively correct answer like math. 2+2=4 and anyone who is trying to convince you otherwise is either crazy or trying to sell you something. But for most topics they aren't as simple or straightforward even if some people try to make it that way. It's more of a scale. Lots of grey.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

to sell you something. But for most topics they aren't as simple or straightforward even if some people try to make it that way. It's more of a scale. Lots of grey.

Just because there are scales of grey doesn't mean there are not more correct versions of things depending on your goals. Just because they are not clear does not mean they don't exist. Simple and straightforwardness have nothing in relation to the correctness of them but the accessibility of that correctness.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Yeah, at that point we're playing semantics, then I think since we're reaching a point of agreeing on the premise of the idea with different terms.