▲ 1167 ▼ Russia Not on US Tariff List Despite Broad Global Reach | Sweden Herald (swedenherald.com) submitted 1 year ago by schizoidman@lemm.ee to c/world@lemmy.world 151 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] el_twitto@lemmy.world 277 points 1 year ago (4 children) Trump is definitely a Russian asset. permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago (2 children) His Parents were Soviet assets and he was adopted from Russia, so it checks out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] monarch@lemm.ee 70 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 107 points 1 year ago (2 children) Let's see the birth certificate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 child) Only the long form one will do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago The longest. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Carvex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago ...every accusation is an admission... permalink fedilink source parent [–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) I’m honestly not sure how that would apply to infant adoptions. It’s my understanding that if the adoption occurs early enough, the adoptive parents will be listed on the birth certificate. It certainly feels like a child adopted in infancy by citizens should be just as eligible for the presidency as a child naturally born to citizens, but I’d also have a hard time drawing a line age-wise after which that would no longer apply and I do see a reason to bar children adopted at 17 from the presidency. My niece was adopted at three years old and she does remember her biological mother, but she’s absolutely my sister and brother in law’s daughter, in terms of her personality, culture, and values. That’s only a data point of one and I’d like more, but I don’t know how easy that would be to track for other adopted children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yeather@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago If she has a US birth certificate she would be a citizen I believe. If not any attempt to run for office would be questioned. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well, he could just show his birth certificate, right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago They forged it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (1 child) Uh, what? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 year ago I don't think it landed well but I think he's Rubber/Glue-ing the Obama birth certificate thing back to him. permalink fedilink source parent [–] feanpoli@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago And Putin isn't a U.S. asset? While both countries are geopolitical adversaries, their military and strategic moves have ironically helped sustain each other's defense industries; just not in a cooperative way. permalink fedilink source parent [+] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -12 points 1 year ago* Embracing the Ultra-Nationalist Paleocon wing of the Republican Party and stuffing your administration with goldbugs and Silicon Valley anarcho-capitalists? Why does an American President consuming American Propaganda and regurgitating a uniquely American public policy at the behest of his wealthiest American peers and hooting white-nationalist proles waving American flags get flagged as Russian? permalink fedilink source parent [+] index@sh.itjust.works -17 points 1 year ago (1 child) US is the richest country in the world and the one with the largest and most advanced army. To me it sound quite unlikely to believe that the president of USA is controlled by russia (a country that is 10 times less rich). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] moriquende@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not sure what the things you say have to do with anything? Trump is an individual who got voted into the presidency largely thanks to social media manipulation, which is known to often originate from Russian bot and troll farms. There's no reason to believe the USA being rich (which only means a few individuals and corporations are very rich, btw) or having the largest army could have prevented it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] index@sh.itjust.works -8 points 1 year ago social media manipulation Biggest social media are all owned by private american corporations in bed with the government. Same as before to me it doesn't sound much likely that the russian government can successfully manipulate them. There’s no reason to believe the USA being rich (which only means a few individuals and corporations are very rich, btw) or having the largest army could have prevented it. Having the largest army doesn't mean they have more guys running around in a field. USA has the most technological advanced army in the world, they have the biggest mass surveillance network, more military facilities around the world, more satellites in orbit and they top everyone else in cyberwarfare. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago (2 children) His Parents were Soviet assets and he was adopted from Russia, so it checks out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] monarch@lemm.ee 70 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 107 points 1 year ago (2 children) Let's see the birth certificate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 child) Only the long form one will do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago The longest. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Carvex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago ...every accusation is an admission... permalink fedilink source parent [–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) I’m honestly not sure how that would apply to infant adoptions. It’s my understanding that if the adoption occurs early enough, the adoptive parents will be listed on the birth certificate. It certainly feels like a child adopted in infancy by citizens should be just as eligible for the presidency as a child naturally born to citizens, but I’d also have a hard time drawing a line age-wise after which that would no longer apply and I do see a reason to bar children adopted at 17 from the presidency. My niece was adopted at three years old and she does remember her biological mother, but she’s absolutely my sister and brother in law’s daughter, in terms of her personality, culture, and values. That’s only a data point of one and I’d like more, but I don’t know how easy that would be to track for other adopted children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yeather@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago If she has a US birth certificate she would be a citizen I believe. If not any attempt to run for office would be questioned. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well, he could just show his birth certificate, right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago They forged it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (1 child) Uh, what? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 year ago I don't think it landed well but I think he's Rubber/Glue-ing the Obama birth certificate thing back to him. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] monarch@lemm.ee 70 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 107 points 1 year ago (2 children) Let's see the birth certificate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 child) Only the long form one will do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago The longest. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Carvex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago ...every accusation is an admission... permalink fedilink source parent [–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) I’m honestly not sure how that would apply to infant adoptions. It’s my understanding that if the adoption occurs early enough, the adoptive parents will be listed on the birth certificate. It certainly feels like a child adopted in infancy by citizens should be just as eligible for the presidency as a child naturally born to citizens, but I’d also have a hard time drawing a line age-wise after which that would no longer apply and I do see a reason to bar children adopted at 17 from the presidency. My niece was adopted at three years old and she does remember her biological mother, but she’s absolutely my sister and brother in law’s daughter, in terms of her personality, culture, and values. That’s only a data point of one and I’d like more, but I don’t know how easy that would be to track for other adopted children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yeather@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago If she has a US birth certificate she would be a citizen I believe. If not any attempt to run for office would be questioned. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well, he could just show his birth certificate, right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago They forged it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 107 points 1 year ago (2 children) Let's see the birth certificate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 child) Only the long form one will do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago The longest. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Carvex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago ...every accusation is an admission... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 child) Only the long form one will do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago The longest. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago ...every accusation is an admission... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) I’m honestly not sure how that would apply to infant adoptions. It’s my understanding that if the adoption occurs early enough, the adoptive parents will be listed on the birth certificate. It certainly feels like a child adopted in infancy by citizens should be just as eligible for the presidency as a child naturally born to citizens, but I’d also have a hard time drawing a line age-wise after which that would no longer apply and I do see a reason to bar children adopted at 17 from the presidency. My niece was adopted at three years old and she does remember her biological mother, but she’s absolutely my sister and brother in law’s daughter, in terms of her personality, culture, and values. That’s only a data point of one and I’d like more, but I don’t know how easy that would be to track for other adopted children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yeather@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago If she has a US birth certificate she would be a citizen I believe. If not any attempt to run for office would be questioned. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago If she has a US birth certificate she would be a citizen I believe. If not any attempt to run for office would be questioned. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well, he could just show his birth certificate, right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago They forged it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago They forged it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (1 child) Uh, what? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 year ago I don't think it landed well but I think he's Rubber/Glue-ing the Obama birth certificate thing back to him. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 year ago I don't think it landed well but I think he's Rubber/Glue-ing the Obama birth certificate thing back to him. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] feanpoli@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago And Putin isn't a U.S. asset? While both countries are geopolitical adversaries, their military and strategic moves have ironically helped sustain each other's defense industries; just not in a cooperative way. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -12 points 1 year ago* Embracing the Ultra-Nationalist Paleocon wing of the Republican Party and stuffing your administration with goldbugs and Silicon Valley anarcho-capitalists? Why does an American President consuming American Propaganda and regurgitating a uniquely American public policy at the behest of his wealthiest American peers and hooting white-nationalist proles waving American flags get flagged as Russian? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] index@sh.itjust.works -17 points 1 year ago (1 child) US is the richest country in the world and the one with the largest and most advanced army. To me it sound quite unlikely to believe that the president of USA is controlled by russia (a country that is 10 times less rich). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] moriquende@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not sure what the things you say have to do with anything? Trump is an individual who got voted into the presidency largely thanks to social media manipulation, which is known to often originate from Russian bot and troll farms. There's no reason to believe the USA being rich (which only means a few individuals and corporations are very rich, btw) or having the largest army could have prevented it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] index@sh.itjust.works -8 points 1 year ago social media manipulation Biggest social media are all owned by private american corporations in bed with the government. Same as before to me it doesn't sound much likely that the russian government can successfully manipulate them. There’s no reason to believe the USA being rich (which only means a few individuals and corporations are very rich, btw) or having the largest army could have prevented it. Having the largest army doesn't mean they have more guys running around in a field. USA has the most technological advanced army in the world, they have the biggest mass surveillance network, more military facilities around the world, more satellites in orbit and they top everyone else in cyberwarfare. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] moriquende@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not sure what the things you say have to do with anything? Trump is an individual who got voted into the presidency largely thanks to social media manipulation, which is known to often originate from Russian bot and troll farms. There's no reason to believe the USA being rich (which only means a few individuals and corporations are very rich, btw) or having the largest army could have prevented it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] index@sh.itjust.works -8 points 1 year ago social media manipulation Biggest social media are all owned by private american corporations in bed with the government. Same as before to me it doesn't sound much likely that the russian government can successfully manipulate them. There’s no reason to believe the USA being rich (which only means a few individuals and corporations are very rich, btw) or having the largest army could have prevented it. Having the largest army doesn't mean they have more guys running around in a field. USA has the most technological advanced army in the world, they have the biggest mass surveillance network, more military facilities around the world, more satellites in orbit and they top everyone else in cyberwarfare. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] index@sh.itjust.works -8 points 1 year ago social media manipulation Biggest social media are all owned by private american corporations in bed with the government. Same as before to me it doesn't sound much likely that the russian government can successfully manipulate them. There’s no reason to believe the USA being rich (which only means a few individuals and corporations are very rich, btw) or having the largest army could have prevented it. Having the largest army doesn't mean they have more guys running around in a field. USA has the most technological advanced army in the world, they have the biggest mass surveillance network, more military facilities around the world, more satellites in orbit and they top everyone else in cyberwarfare. permalink fedilink source parent