this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
131 points (100.0% liked)

sino

8217 readers
30 users here now

This is a comm for news, information, and discussion on anything China and Chinese related.

Rules:

  1. Follow the Hexbear Code Of Conduct.

  2. Imperialism will result in a ban.

  3. Sinophobic content will be removed.


Newcomer Welcome Wiki


FAQ:


China Guides:


Multimedia:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

I wonder if it's economically viable at this point? I know that solar panels produce much more energy in space and are probably more reliable but is it going to be enough to cover the cost of maintenance? Getting stuff to space is still very expensive

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm guessing they've done at least basic cost/benefit analysis here. :)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

sure, but what I'm asking is, is it an actual power plant or a research project?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago

So far it just looks like a proposal, but a lot of prior research has been done on the subject already. NASA has a number of studies discussing efficiency, costs, etc. I imagine they'll do a trial experiment first, and then depending on how that goes they'll decide whether to scale it up or not.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago

Having a power plant that literally solves the energy problem is worth pretty much anything. Especially for a country like China, which has to import huge amounts of oil through geopolitically risky routes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have intresting news a out comunist China ans their views on infrastructure needing to be profitable.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'm talking about viability, not profitability. Obviously a power plant should generate more energy than you put into it

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah, it's solar panels. We know they work. If it it negative efficient they can just cover the expense. It is worth it to pay for clean energy.