this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
176 points (98.9% liked)

politics

22611 readers
4292 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

White House aides are anxious ahead of Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" announcement on Tuesday, expecting new "reciprocal tariffs" but lacking clear details.

Even key figures like VP J.D. Vance and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles remain uncertain. An insider told Politico, "No one knows what the f--k is going on."

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and adviser Kevin Hassett said tariffs would target 10–15 countries, but Trump contradicted them, claiming all countries would face tariffs.

The confusion and internal contradictions have sparked fears of economic fallout and political backlash.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 67 points 4 days ago (3 children)

At this point we can consider ourselves lucky if he doesn't straight up announce the annexation of either Canada or Greenland.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 days ago

I honestly think it will be this.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

That’s what I’m expecting. The optimist in me thinks he could pull an amnesia on wensday about tariffs to right the economy. But probably just invade Greenland or something

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Which would be an illegal order that wouldn't be followed.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There have been how many illegal acts so far that his stooges have followed along with? Nothing is illegal if there’s no one willing to enforce it and no one willing to refuse to obey.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I'm talking about the army specifically, the most basic grunt has an obligation to refuse to obey illegal orders even if they come from the Joint chief of staff in person. The process is simple, confirm the order, day you believe it to be illegal, refuse to obey until proven wrong.

And again, with both armies being so intertwined, they would be asking to fight their friends, the odds that they would refuse these illegal orders would be even higher. Add the attacks on VA by the Republicans and the worst case scenario would be that the army would be divided and the pro-Trump camp would end up fighting the anti-Trump camp.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

The process is simple, confirm the order, day you believe it to be illegal, refuse to obey until proven wrong.

They'll get jailed or discharged because who cares? If America is at war Trump can do even more crazy shit. They're gonna sacrifice a few willing and disposable idiots in meaningless suicide missions until the rest of the grunts feel guilty for not helping their fellow soldiers. Morale will be abysmal but so is that of the Russian troops and yet they're fighting. I wouldn't rely on the military to put an end to this. It rarely plays out that way.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I have a unique perspective on that, and I’ll tell you it’s absolutely no different in the army or military than it is in the government with DOGE walking into agencies it SHOULD have no jurisdiction over and ordering them to stand down, then destroying them from within.

Right now the propaganda machine is rolling at %100 convincing the Right that what they’re doing is in defense of the constitution, against the Left’s evils. You have enough stooges in place as leaders, and out enough people who still have a spine, and the rest will (and have) fall in line.

Deporting college students without Due Process? Or protesters, or immigrants? Unconstitutional. Using DOGE to destroy legislative controlled agencies? Unconstitutional. Using DOGE to destroy legislatively mandated executive agencies? Unconstitutional. Attacking the media and their 1A? Unconstitutional. Being crowned god-king by the SCOTUS? Yeah, unconstitutional.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The difference is that the army drills that into the soldiers mind, public servants might be told to do it in passing as part of their onboarding, it's never made as clear as in the army.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I am telling you, that it doesn’t matter. When you replace the leaders who had a spine with stooges, and then beat down anyone else at the bottom who had a spine, and then start firing or refusing to pay people who aren’t falling in line, everyone else will follow along with whatever you want them to.

Look at the media right now, as a perfect example. Look at universities right now. People are afraid to speak out, because speaking out is being beaten out of them. It will and it has reached the military, too.

It’s naive to think that the military will stand up to it. The Trump administration already fired the leaders who could stand up to them, and then killed ‘DEI’ efforts to ensure that leaders know that they’re there only as long as they’re useful to the guys at the top.

Edit: HTF do you think murdering, executing, and committing genocide was normalized for the people and militaries in Nazi Germany and Israel right now? It’s happening here, and pretty soon convincing the military that Canada, Mexico, or Europe are enemies won’t be difficult. “They’re colluding to commit economic warfare against us! MAGA! Protect America from these bully Europeans!”

Edit 2: I’m afraid of speaking my opinions at work, or to say anything about my beliefs. I know good and well that there are ‘loyalty tests’ coming up, and I’m having to keep my head down now so that I don’t get labeled ‘not loyal enough’ now. And Lemmy here? In the future me exercising my 1A here could end up with me being fired or worse, sent to a gulag somewhere removing toxic waste from the soil after the US nukes itself. (The Handmaiden’s Tale reference.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Wont they just be shot or disappeared? Its not like the army hasn't any experience or problems with murder.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You mean like pretty much every order he has given that has been followed??

[–] [email protected] -5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What illegal orders has the army been given? None.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You mean like the the unsanction invasion of Iraq under the false pretense of WMD?... No, that never happened

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

Oh so your claim is that Trumps's illegal orders would be refused? Not illegal orders from other presidents? OK my bad

I guess the illegal deportations would be my answer then... Aren't these done with military planes?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In theory it wouldn't be followed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

With how mixed together the US and Canadian armies are, the grunts would probably rather shoot the people giving the order instead of following them. You might have some MAGA soldiers, but that just means that instead of fighting "the enemy" the US Army will end up fighting itself.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What legally constitutes an illegal order? I wonder if this would qualify. Certainly, I should hope it does.