521
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 59 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What the fuck are you talking about this is at the top of /all/ and it's about a socialist country, of course socialists are here.

Feel free to point to the "brigade" organisation that exists, it's a figment of your imagination. Nobody is brigading anything by simply using the fucking site. Are you brigading by being here too then?

[-] [email protected] 53 points 2 years ago

brigading is when I get ratioed, and the more ratioed I am the more brigading it is

[-] [email protected] 39 points 2 years ago

I've got 3 fucking years of practice posting nonsensical shit in megathreads and I'm just now starting to feel the power this has in threads like this one.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Keep pretending China is socialist.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago

Keep pretending it isn't, lib.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

You're the only liberal here for kissing a capitalist nation's ass.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

bro even wikipedia acknowledges china is socialist lmao

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

Socialist Market Economy is a socialist mode of production. :bean:

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Right, and the sky is green too.

Adding the word "socialist" in front of "market economy" doesn't make it any less capitalist. I'm done with this.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

nuh uh because it means that the CPC has final say over shit with regards to the economy and governance instead of just leaving things up to the market like a true capitalist country

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

That's called state capitalism wise guy.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

State capitalism is when you execute billionaires and enact compulsory planning for key parts of the nation's development such as health and infrastructure.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

No but state capitalism is when the majority of billionaires are allowed to exist in the first place dumbass. Tight regulations don't make you socialist. And putting money into health and infrastructure is possible under capitalism LMFAO

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

majority of billionaires are allowed to exist in the first place dumbass

Socialism is a transitory stage between capitalism and communism where there is ongoing class warfare between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat my dude. In China, the state is on the side of the proletariat, not the bourgeois.

And putting money into health and infrastructure is possible under capitalism

And yet China is the only major power where the state has a tight grip on both... Interesting!

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

In China, the state is on the side of the proletariat, not the bourgeois

THEN BAN BILLIONAIRES AND STOP FOLLOWING DENG'S CAPITALISM JFC. Not that hard if they were actually socialist and aiming for communism.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

Not that hard if they were actually socialist

So why haven't you done it yet?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

wojak-nooo : NOOOO!!! WHY HAVENT YOU PRESSED THE COMMUNISM BUTTON XI?! NOOO!!!

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

“[Capitalists] act as if they are being chased by a bear,” wrote Zhang Lin, a Beijing political commentator, in response to these comments. “They are powerless to control the bear, so they are competing to outrun each other to escape the animal.”

og-hex-bear

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

All of the billionaires allowed to exist under your socialist project, so you're not really in a position to judge.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Cool then let’s have the CPC run the USA, I’m sure you’re okay with that since China is actually capitalist, right? It should totally be the same here if the CPC takes control, right? Right?

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Hey, coward, explain how you can simultaneously believe that the Donbas is independent and that when Russian troops entered their territory at their request that constituted an invasion.

Explain or admit that you don't consistently believe in self determination.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

When did I say I'm against Russian troops entering Donbas territory? I made it very clear I'm against Russian troops entering anywhere BUT Donbas. Love how you guys claim to be anti-war until the millisecond a non-western nation is the one committing war crime atrocities and mass murdering civilians.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago

Honestly I wouldn't even much of a problem if they just invaded Donbas

How could they possibly invade the Donbas at all when they were invited?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Semantics. I didn't mean "invade," that was just the word that came in my head. You know damn well what I meant.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

It came into your head for a reason, liar. I guess going forward, nobody should assume that you mean what you say.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

You're just gonna ignore the fact I said and have been saying I supported it huh? Fucking Russia lovers with no understanding of nuance

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

if person.beliefs != NatoPropaganda:

person.status = RussiaLover

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Erm...

if person.beliefs != RussianPropaganda:

person.status = NATOLover

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Im actually surprised that you could read the runes, interesting.

However I never said that you loved NATO lmao you just uncritically consume *and parrot their propaganda about Russia being le big evil in this situation.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Would you support America invading and drone striking the Middle East because separatists in a single province were being oppressed by their native government and wanted US help? How is this any different? Would you support Kazakhstan invading all of China for oppressing Uyghurs in Xinjiang who wanted to break away (which I know you love to deny but is very much a reality even if exaggerated by MSM)?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

So lemmy get this straight, NATO going across a few oceans and continents to destroy a country of brown people in another white supremacist crusade for resources, as they do, is the same as...

A country filled with a certain ethnic group wanting to invade a region on their doorstep because NATO is fortifying it as a strongpoint to destroy it, and a bunch of Nazis are slaughtering civilians of the said same ethnic group within the said region?

Would you support Kazakhstan invading all of China for oppressing Uyghurs in Xinjiang

So basically exaggerated bullshit reports from MSM and Adrian Zenz of people being put in vocational schools is the same as Azov mass murdering innocent civilians?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Are you suggesting that the majority of Uyghurs support ETIM. Furthermore, ARE you stating that you personally support the self determination of the ETIM movement?

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

I have no idea and it is obviously a hypothetical if they did.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

I have no idea

Yeah that's abundantly clear

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

If I said that I supported people's rights to sell marijuana and I didn't even think they should get much jail time for it, people would rightly point out that I was lying about my support.

You stated that you supported self determination for people in the Donbas, and I didn't ignore it at all, I'm saying that even within the same post you proved that you actually didn't when you referred to their allies entering their territory as an invasion.

Again, I'm not ignoring anything, I just think you're a liar and that you only started pretending to support the Donbas's self determination because doing otherwise would undermine the point you were trying to make about Taiwan.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

The kingdom of your God is not socialist, it is a monarchy.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Keep pretending Catholicism has anything to do with socialism.

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
521 points (92.8% liked)

World News

36485 readers
599 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS