697
both pretty extreme (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
109 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/23485321

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 2 years ago (25 children)

No no, they pretend (even to themselves, I think) that they can't tell them apart, but they can and like what they see from the right more. They deny it because it's not politically/socially expedient, but this is why when push comes to shove they invariably fall in with the right.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
    •
  • [+] -18 points 2 years ago (24 children)

    All centrists are basically leftists.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    most centrist are secretly fascists, they just don't have the balls to say it outright like right wingers

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    I wouldn't go that far. Centrists, and most right wingers actually, aren't fascist by default. They provide a fertile ground for fascism and will likely support it once it takes hold, but most of them aren't ideologically committed to establishing an ethnostate. I mean screw them anyway; they do support protecting the capitalist aristocracy (I'm not kidding this is a central tenet of conservatism), but let's not use the word where it doesn't belong.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -19 points 2 years ago (14 children)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    found a fascist

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [+] -9 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    Sorry, but you're just uneducated on the subject.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Claims the clown spouting "Hitler was a socialist". xD

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Any reason to suggest he wasn't socialist?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (8 children)

    He persecuted socialists (basically the first people sent to concentration camps) and had capitalist policies? Any reason to suggest he was fond of Marx?

    But Mr (assumed) "proletarians_must_suffer" probably thinks that "socialism is when the state does stuff".

    Go bother someone else in some ancap forum, where you belong.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    He persecuted socialists

    Are bolsheviks socialist? Bc they also persecuted socialists, communists, anarchists, etc, etc.

    and had capitalist policies

    He literally limited the profitability of companies to 6%.

    Any reason to suggest he was fond of Marx?

    He's non-marxist socialist. Not all socialist are Marxists. Btw, fascists are Marxists. They're what you call "revisionists".

    Go bother someone else in some ancap forum, where you belong.

    I'm not an ancap.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Are bolsheviks socialist?

    No. They were state-capitalists.

    He literally limited the profitability of companies to 6%.

    You agree that companies made profits. That's a capitalist policy.

    He’s non-marxist socialist. Not all socialist are Marxists.

    I didn't say whether or not he was a Marxist. All socialists apply Marxist analysis at least partially. Even Bakunin agreed with Marx's theory.

    Btw, fascists are Marxists.

    🤡

    I’m not an ancap.

    You're enough of an ancap for me to care how you define yourself. You've proven enough how little of political/historical understanding you have.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    No. They were state-capitalists.

    Ok.

    You agree that companies made profits. That’s a capitalist policy.

    Considering what was before, it was a gradual step towards socialism. Nazi Germany existed for like 30 years. Not everything can be implemented immediately.

    All socialists apply Marxist analysis at least partially

    Uhuh. Is Charles Fourier socialist?

    You’re enough of an ancap

    What is that even supposed to mean?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Considering what was before, it was a gradual step towards socialism. Nazi Germany existed for like 30 years.

    Ah, yes. And Hitler clearly stated that he was a socialist... somewhere. You have to read between the lines of "Mein Kampf", where he clearly states that he's right wing. And all the companies who profited immensly from all that slave labour where juuuust about to be socialised. /s

    Uhuh. Is Charles Fourier socialist?

    Got any proper points, or are you just gonna "umm actually" me to death?

    What is that even supposed to mean?

    You're a weirdo who deserves to be ridiculed for having such a stupid worldview.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Ah, yes. And Hitler clearly stated that he was a socialist… somewhere

    I didn't say it. Although he did.

    You have to read between the lines of “Mein Kampf”, where he clearly states that he’s right wing.

    Where?

    Btw are bolsheviks communists? Bc they clearly stated they are. No need to even read between the lines.

    And all the companies who profited immensly from all that slave labour

    And what's the relation between capitalism and slavery?

    Got any proper points, or are you just gonna “umm actually” me to death?

    The point is that socialists can be socialists without applying Marx works in any way.

    You’re a weirdo who deserves to be ridiculed for having such a stupid worldview

    What worldview? What is my worldview?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I didn’t say it. Although he did.

    Where? Here, maybe, where he ridicules the people who think the Nazis were socialists?

    Wie oft haben wir uns geschüttelt vor Lachen über diese einfältigen bürgerlichen Angsthasen, angesichts des geistvollen Rätselratens über unsere Herkunft, unsere Absichten und unser Ziel. Wir haben die rote Farbe unserer Plakate nach genauem und gründlichem Überlegen gewählt, um dadurch die linke Seite zu reizen, zur Empörung zu bringen und sie zu verleiten, in unsere Versammlungen zu kommen, wenn auch nur, um sie zu sprengen, damit wir auf diese Weise überhaupt mit den Leuten reden konnten.

    Where?

    In this chapter, for example

    Btw are bolsheviks communists? Bc they clearly stated they are. No need to even read between the lines.

    They stated that as their goal. The Nazis stated a Reich enuring 1000 years as their goal. Did those succeed?

    And what’s the relation between capitalism and slavery?

    They're compatible.

    The point is that socialists can be socialists without applying Marx works in any way.

    Name one socialist that came after Marx that doesn't agree with him in some manner or the other.

    What worldview? What is my worldview?

    Please, enlighten me. I could do with a bit of absurd fantasy worldbuilding.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Where?

    In some interview or article, I believe.

    They stated that as their goal. The Nazis stated a Reich enuring 1000 years as their goal. Did those succeed?

    So unless someone achieves communism, they're not a communist? Btw, since 3rd Reich didn't follow all nazi tenants and didn't achieve all nazi goals, maybe they weren't nazis?

    Name one socialist that came after Marx that doesn’t agree with him in some manner or the other

    Hitler

    Sorry, but you've set up this perfect punchline yourself.

    Please, enlighten me

    Oh, so you don't know what my views are, but have already concluded they're absurd. Well, jokes on you, I'm an anarcho communist (no)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    In some interview or article, I believe.

    Sure you didn't read that in a dream?

    So unless someone achieves communism, they’re not a communist?

    Why did you ask whether or not the bolsheviki were communists, exactly?

    Hitler

    Circular logic as an "argument", then. Gotcha.

    Oh, so you don’t know what my views are, but have already concluded they’re absurd.

    You've given enough hints (you consider yourself far right than call the Nazis far left), so I took a guess. I was open to reach another conclusion...

    I’m an anarcho communist (no)

    ... But clearly, you're afraid of further ridicule.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    this bait sucks try harder

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is only true when considered on a different scale. In the United States where left and right are both still on the right, absolutely not. In a country when both sides lean more left, maybe.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •