this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
782 points (99.1% liked)

World News

45858 readers
2852 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich urged a global boycott of U.S. travel to protest Trump’s policies, warning his administration is “brutally attacking U.S. democracy.”

In a Guardian op-ed, Reich called on foreign visitors, students, and skilled workers to reconsider coming, citing economic and safety concerns. He argued withholding tourism revenue could pressure Trump.

His plea follows Trump’s anti-immigration crackdown and rising tensions with Canada.

Reich’s call comes as Canadian travel to the U.S. has already shown signs of decline.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So I'm ... Binational i guess, 1 foot in the us and 1 in northern Europe.

Until recently I preferred the coasts of the US, but it was a close thing, both were nice, the lack of a patronizing state was quite pleasant.

Now clearly the balance shifted to shit and northern Europe knocks the us into a cocked hat.

But when the us is good, it's actually quite good.

You can have a civilization made of many civilizations, that's how our multiculturalism worked (when it worked) and it was incredible.

But like saying all of Europe has no civilization because they don't all share the same uniform culture.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

You can't have one when everyone's alienated from each other, that's the point. Civilisation is more than the mere sum of its parts: When you do not care about someone else deciding to e.g. oppress a fellow compatriot you only have the sum, not the more. A population, but not a civilisation.

You can have a civilization made of many civilizations

That's not what e pluribus unum means. That's what in varietate concordia means.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And you misunderstood entirely.

I'm speaking of respect for each other's uniqueness without embracing it.

You can be or do whatever you want, I respect your right to do so even if I think it's stupid. I just stay mostly quiet about it, maybe light mockery.

I think religious people are basically mentally disabled. But so long as they follow basic rules (don't enforce it on others or your kids strongly), then let the short bus morons believe whatever they want.

Would we be better off with religious eliminated by force? Possibly. But then someone else would have another crazy idea and decide things would be better if nonbelievers of that were eliminated by force, and the circle would begin again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And you misunderstood entirely.

Last I checked, "not caring" has exactly the meaning I took it to have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In America, we define respect of other peoples' beliefs and cultures as apathy.

We politely ignore them, they politely ignore us, so long as nobody crosses a line the arrangement works splendidly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

How can you know you cross lines when you don't care, are apathetic?

First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season."

Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.

...I don't think I need to attribute that quote.