this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
210 points (99.1% liked)

World News

35182 readers
450 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The mentality where you think people "deserve" things, I think it's just irrational. If your goal in politics is to do best by all, then you're working against your goal. If that's not your goal, then it should be. Wishing harm on anyone is literally a last resort when there is no preferable option and where more good comes out of that harm than bad - otherwise it's an ethical negative. It's alarming to me how few people seem to have thought through that logic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not a pacifist. Save your sermon?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's not a hobby. It's not subjective. Something is either good or bad, in total (some real number value on that axis, to be specific). The kind of thing you said is literally a cop-out of confronting that. The need to put some "ist"/"ism" label on it just avoids dealing with the question entirely. That's not the definition of pacifism, what I said is the framework to situationally decide whether pacifism or something else is more ethical.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's a lot of words I don't give a fuck about. Jfc you're a whiney ass. Idngaf and at this point can't wait for you to get deployed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

You would know.