this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
129 points (97.8% liked)

Canada

8550 readers
1909 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Canada desperately needs a national strategic internet constellation.

Edit to fix link.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Fibre is not going to get us up north.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Similar problems with fibre to all of Australia. It's just not feasible for small remote communities.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Microwave towers? They don't bridge enormous distances but can bypass areas that it would be inadvisable to lay cable

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Terrestrial solutions for remote areas typically have excessive build out and maintenance costs.

Engineers will do a tradeoff and select the most suitable solution given the criteria. It's very easy to underestimate costs, particularly over the entire lifetime of the system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Maybe when we get 6g and our avian bird flu boosters we can get 6g access through our minds 🀯

/s due to it being utterly insane, but I recognize Poe's law is alive more than ever now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

There are solutions for the far arctic that aren't high density mesh networks polluting low earth orbit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Yes there are such solutions, but for remote regions without infrastructure and with high build out and operating/maintenance costs for terrestrial technology, I suspect that the most cost effective solution that we can achieve in a timely fashion is probably LEO, like Lightspeed or Starlink. Particularly since Canada has half a century of experience building satellite systems.

Managing LEO debris and congestion is not an insurmountable challenge.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Buddy, I'm an aero eng. There are lots of ways to get satellites in polar orbits.

Why didn't you look at the actual Lightspeed site from Telesat? Why would you pick a random paper? The Telesat site explains how they get coverage in polar regions.

https://www.telesat.com/leo-satellites/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There are lots of ways to get satellites in polar orbits.

Of course there are, but the customers are mostly not at the poles, so any times the satellites spend at the poles is wasted.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

I suggest you look up the solution that Telesat will use. I'm not involved in that project, but a quick glance shows me that the engineers involved have probably done their homework and have considered the customer base and their needs, including the need to service all regions of the country.