this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
41 points (100.0% liked)

movies

2764 readers
319 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Competition is good, but Paramount doesn't have enough content to actually compete. I'm honestly shocked that they've kept their service running this long. I'm not going to subscribe to a dozen different platforms, and Paramount is never going to make the cut.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

While I do agree competition is healthy. I don’t think every company should have their own streaming service, it’s not sustainable and means that each company needs to be churning out consistent content. It would make more sense if they just let their content be accessible through the platforms that would dedicate themselves to streaming.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

competition is healthy but fuck i wish they didn’t compete on catalogue - i wish they competed on features, or maybe “premium offerings” or something

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago

I’d argue studios shouldn’t own the channels at all. It’s hamstringing the industry, starving out movie theaters and preventing creatives from shopping their content to competitors.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I use a family log-in for paramount w/ Showtime.

I use it almost entirely for showtime. There's definitely some decent things on paramount. But once you've seen them that's it. They don't really have a lot of new content.

And it seems to be an almost genre specific streaming service.

If I'm in the mood for a comedy or something light I don't even bother looking through paramount.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

In Australia Paramount+ has the A-League broadcast rights, so I subscribe purely for that. It is very cheap by streaming standards here ($7 for the base tier with ads) and has a pretty good collection of films too. TV series are really where it struggles.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, but Star Trek, though. That's a "killer feature" for a lot of people.

Paramount+ doesn't work for shit, though. They keep inventing new and different ways to break. Even if you're really into the content they provide, they're so hard to work with and keep working consistently. Not like Netflix or Prime Video or Disney+ or whatever. (Hulu is... pretty janky as well. But anyway.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

They have all those Taylor Sheridan programs people are hooked on as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

Yep this is the only reason I have a subscription. The number and length of ads I get on it are ridiculous though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

I get whatever I can get a deal on.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 hours ago

Yes we know. Good for you. Now you can stop spamming this everywhere.