this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
857 points (97.1% liked)

memes

12236 readers
2343 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One note about Waterfox is that I would have liked if it was added to the official Arch Linux repos. I installed fine with the AUR, but still.

Available on Flathub.

I tend to go with Flathub before the AUR, if available. ๐Ÿ‘

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I tend to go with Flathub before the AUR, if available.

This is the correct way to Linux in 2025

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

Not for firefox, critical firefox security feature not available in flatpak: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1756236

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 7 minutes ago

This is FUD. It definitely is not a "critical" security feature. Firefox flatpak can't currently do its own internal sandboxing of subprocesses via namespaces, but it does do seccomp bpf filtering. That's in addition to the standard sandboxing of flatpak itself, which is implemented using namespaces anyways.

If you are extra paranoid, you can tweak the flatpak's permissions to harden the sandboxing via your distro's flatpak settings app.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cool. Could you elaborate? Because I only do this because of some kind of gut feeling... ๐Ÿ˜…

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Flatpaks are containerized, making them both more reliable and more secure (in general... but it's always possible to fuck things up).

Besides the benefits to users, there are also huge benefits to developers: they can publish a single package and support nearly every distro with it.

It's often impossible for a dev to publish and maintain packages for all Linux distros out there, so stuff on AUR is built and packaged by well-meaning, but random people who are not the original developer. This very often leads to the app having bugs and compatibility issues which the developer ends up wasting time debugging and trying to fix even though it's not their fault. (although downstream packagers can fuck this up too by publishing their own unofficial Flatpaks, like Fedora's recent OBS shenanigans)

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 49 minutes ago

Firefox flatpak less secure because namespace not available in flatpak: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1756236

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah, the OBS thing. Yeah, I guess these are the reasons I've felt like Flatpaks are a bit more stable than AUR packages. They might take up more space or whatever, but it's nice to know they work like they're supposed to, especially commercial stuff like Spotify and Slack etc. I just wish Flatpak software integrated better with the rest of the system without extra configuration.