▲ 1172 ▼ What more need be said about it? (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world [M] to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 174 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] solidstate@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Yeah I got that impression from the other comments. I might go back to just that part for the hell of it. Seems to be kind of a meme. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Hitchie_Rawtin@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago Beware, it's a 3hr long monologue. permalink fedilink source parent [–] batmaniam@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago I'm the guy from above who said I liked the "quantity over quality" she had because it let me get lost. Even I skipped "the speech" lmfao. It just repeats the shitty, not subtle, ideas that have been repeated 100x by that point, and even within itself it repeats the same damn thing over and over and over. I can see it being a nifty writing technique to basically have an academic paper micro-version of the whole work diogenically within your philosophy tilted book, but the problem is if that was the intent, it's a paper that no one would publish because it sucks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hitchie_Rawtin@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago Beware, it's a 3hr long monologue. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] batmaniam@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago I'm the guy from above who said I liked the "quantity over quality" she had because it let me get lost. Even I skipped "the speech" lmfao. It just repeats the shitty, not subtle, ideas that have been repeated 100x by that point, and even within itself it repeats the same damn thing over and over and over. I can see it being a nifty writing technique to basically have an academic paper micro-version of the whole work diogenically within your philosophy tilted book, but the problem is if that was the intent, it's a paper that no one would publish because it sucks. permalink fedilink source parent
