this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
32 points (86.4% liked)

World News

33528 readers
566 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

jeffrey sachs is not merely an innocent economist/journalist though.

he helped turn the soviet union to capitalism (with a dash of fascism) and came up with the framework to subjugate any country to imperialist goals. he is the one responsible for the things he allegedly doesnt like.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I'm well aware of his work and the impact it has had (although a bunch of it has been overblown). It makes no difference to how valid his point is. What's more his credentials lend him great credibility among those who still believe in the dogma of liberalism, and make it undeniable that if a highly accomplished working economist, shares the opinions of many Marxist analysts then delusional libs should probably listen for a change.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

ok you have a good point

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

His perspective on war isn't Marxist. Economics thinking, doesn't put a lot of weight on irrational hatred as a basis for happiness.

It's not only mean and unfair, it's unprofitable to make a war on Russia.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I never said it was. I just said he's liberal economist who has come to some of the same conclusions as Marxists, obviously because of different motivations.