this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
630 points (99.5% liked)

World News

41300 readers
2833 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The interval between the onset of symptoms and death has been 48 hours in the majority of cases, and “that’s what’s really worrying,” Serge Ngalebato, medical director of Bikoro Hospital, a regional monitoring center, told The Associated Press.

The latest disease outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo began on Jan. 21, and 419 cases have been recorded including 53 deaths.

According to the WHO’s Africa office, the first outbreak in the town of Boloko began after three children ate a bat and died within 48 hours following hemorrhagic fever symptoms.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

This is a dumb framing. People want to stop climate change to protect themselves and their loved ones from having to live in an inhospitable hellscape and doom humanity to extinction, not because of an emotional connection to the actual planet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

To me it's ridiculous that we have no reverence for our actual, objective God: the living Earth.

All the fairy tale imaginary sky daddies people kill other people over while actively desecrating our factual creator with abandon.

We're so weird. We have a creator. The natural world. And we've been in a hot war with that only actual God of humans for about a quarter millenia, lol.

We'll lose handily. And life will go on.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

There are definitely religious and spiritual systems that revere nature, like paganism. It's the only thing that really makes sense to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That's a generalisation.

Plenty of people have reverence for the natural world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Certainly not plenty, given what's happening.

And I don't mean empty rhetorical reverence.

Reverence would mean having a zero to positive net environmental impact. Like the Native Americans. They weren't perfect or necessarily peaceful between one another, but they practiced reverence towards the natural world.

Those with practiced reverence towards the natural world don't fare well amongst our species. We take humble coexistence with the Earth as weakness like clockwork. We jail them for ecoterrorism and genocide their cultures because they get in the way of economic and population metastasis, sadly because we consider our God to be subject to us and not the other way around as we're going to learn in the coming decades by our own actions and hubris.

I mean "learn" loosely. Sadly many wouldn't admit to themselves we were wrong or abandon currency as their god even if a CAT 6 just hurled a bus at their head.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

That's subjective as it depends on your definition of reverence and of plenty.

That said, it's a very good point you raised initially and I wholeheartedly agree that it's a bit weird.

I agree that the natural world is, for all intents and purposes, analogous to a god.

I also agree that everyone, particularly the most pious of us, seem determined to disregard this god.

Religion is the wrong word, but I do wish that there was more focus on building appreciation for the natural world.

I'm reminded of the "solar punk" movement. There's an instance slrpnk.net which collates some of these ideas.