this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
191 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37734 readers
444 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WP gift link expires in 14 days.

https://archive.ph/TZtIu

cross-posted from: https://derp.foo/post/119697

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Any job that can be WFH should be WFH.

Any job that can't be WFH that requires sitting at a desk all day should give each person an individual office. The open office plan has been an absolute nightmare, and only benefits micromanagers. It's a productivity disaster, and makes for a miserable experience, and only exists for the sake of surveillance. However, I doubt there are many jobs that can't be WFH that require such a situation.

The real issue here is an intentional mis-framing, imo. Why must people get back to a traditional office setting? The only people who want this are employers who think that Butts In Seats = Productivity, and the only way to ensure it is to intensely surveil your employees. I also don't give two shits if some real estate company goes bankrupt because business tenants stop renting their properties. Boo fucking hoo.

I've been working for a remote-first company now for over a year, and I won't ever got back to working in an office. There is literally nothing about what I do that needs me to be physically present in any specific place. The problem isn't "productivity" or "collaboration", the problem is entirely based around a work culture that is fundamentally punitive, puritanical, and antithetical to life balance.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm very much WFH a huge percentage of the time. I don't think I'm ever going to willingly go back daily or even weekly. There's little to no point. Our society also should want to encourage WFH as much as possible just for environmental benefits.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There’s a lot of psychological benefits to having much smaller communities. It’s been shown that after about 150 people, we tend to not do so well. Seems like the technology is there. The psychology is sound. And our mental health is critical.

The intent and WFH could mean we all live better. Nicer places. Less commuting. Everyone just, happier.

Sooooo….. 💁‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ehhh. I wouldn't say the only people who want an office setting are managers. There are definitely some bonuses to going in to work for some people - a very "to each their own" situation.

But I think the distinction there becomes the "traditional" office setting, because, yeah, no one likes that corporate bull.