Asklemmy

45251 readers

928 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

206

Are there any common household items or products that you think are designed incredibly poorly? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

324 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For example, I'm incredibly confused about how you're supposedly to measure liquid laundry detergent with the cap. At least the kind that I have sits on it's side, so if you measure it with the cap it just leaks everywhere and makes a mess.

Or at my parents house they have a bag of captain crunch berries that has a new design, where instead of zipping along the top of the bag like normal, it has a zipper in the front slightly beneath the top. That way when you poor it you can't see what you're doing cuz the bag is in the way. Like what the heck who's idea was that?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A lot of OTC meds that are in boxes have annoying packaging where you have to peel off the little paper before you can push the pill through the wrapping. The paper doesn't always like to peel off properly and it makes it harder to get the pill out of the packaging.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I always thought this was super on purpose. Is it not intentional design for “child protection?”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

I think it's for anti-tampering purposes. Imagine the consequences if some bad actor tainted those pills with something or replaced the pills with another.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In the UK it's mandatory, ostensibly to prevent deliberate overdoses. You can't buy a big bottle of acetaminophen.

In part because they call it paracetamol.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think I've ever seen packaging as described in the UK. Normally they're packaged in individual blisters that can be pushed through the foil covering in a single step. I'm not sure about this 'peeling' action that's described.

Also, for what's it's worth, medication in the UK is publicly known by it's International Nonproprietary Name rather than brands, so for the most part people will ask for 'paracetamol' rather than Deludomex™ or whatever. 'Acetaminophen' is a new one to me, though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

It's not a brand name. Two American companies picked different compound abbreviations at roughly the same time, and somehow one name spread here and the other name spread everywhere else.