Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

778 readers

106 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.

Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules

Post only about bans or other sanctions that you have received from a mod or admin.
Don’t use private communications to prove your point. We can’t verify them and they can be faked easily.
Don’t deobfuscate mod names from the modlog with admin powers.
Don’t harass mods or brigade comms. Don’t word your posts in a way that would trigger such harassment and brigades.
Do not downvote posts if you think they deserved it. Use the comment votes (see below) for that.
You can post about power trippin’ in any social media, not just lemmy. Feel free to post about reddit or a forum etc.
If you are the accused PTB, while you are welcome to respond, please do so within the relevant post.

Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.

Some acronyms you might see.

PTB - Power-Tripping Bastard: The commenter agrees with you this was a PTB mod.
YDI - You Deserved It: The commenter thinks you deserved that mod action.
BPR - Bait-Provoked Reaction: That mod probably overreacted in charged situation, or due to being baited.
CLM - Clueless mod: The mod probably just doesn't understand how their software works.

Relevant comms

[email protected]

founded 6 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Self report: AITPTB for banning someone for report abuse? (ponder.cat)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So, I saw a report from one of my users. They reported:

https://ponder.cat/post/1594852/1813842

For the reason:

Unreasonable fighting with everyone in every simple post

I think that's ridiculous, so I talked with them about it. Posting private communications is frowned upon I guess, but long story short, they weren't receptive. I've decided to ban the account.

IMO the general culture on Lemmy is that users are entitled to their free account and everyone needs to be careful and circumspect about limiting that entitlement in any way, but I don't see it that way. I don't think it's a requirement for me to provide hosting space for anyone who wants to use my stuff as a jumping-off point for abuse of Lemmy's systems, and isn't apologetic or receptive when I talk with them about not doing that. The fact that it's in service of harassing FlyingSquid in particular is just icing on the cake, since my perception is that people like to harass him apparently for no legitimate reason at all (with this as an example).

AITA?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Agreed.

I think the banned user was using freak when they meant abnormal, but freak does mean abnormal in the dictionary. They even contextualized it by saying all athletes are abnormal by dint of being athletes.

So someone asking for a debate wont give the person they requested a response from the benefit of the doubt and engage with their meaning and not their exact vocabulary (which is still correct, if a little triggering - as you said)

For a third party moderator to jump in and say thats not allowed vocabulary, fine. For someone who asked for the debate to do it, thats constructive abuse and arguing in bad faith.

Anyway, this was a old moderation decision, its not the point of this current post. I think i've illustrated why this user/moderator is so polarizing to many people - which was the inquiry in the actual post here :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, fair enough. And getting hung up on which specific words are being used, and saying that certain words make you a bad person when if you'd said the exact same thing while carefully using other words, it would have been fine, leading to extensive discussions about which are the allowed words and not, is a popular but poisonous pastime.