this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
253 points (88.0% liked)

Technology

61300 readers
2664 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
253
Proton's very biased article on Deepseek (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
110 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Article: https://proton.me/blog/deepseek

Calls it "Deepsneak", failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers - unlike most of the competing SOTA AIs.

I can't speak for Proton, but the last couple weeks are showing some very clear biases coming out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

But that's also true for American companies.

As a European, I trust them as much as I trust Chinese ones.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Ho yeah but they are definitely not ignoring that in the article. It's just that they are talking mostly about the subject of the article which is: deepseek

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

The problem with any kind of journalism like this though is that it talks about the topic of the article, sure, but it doesn't acknowledge the other relevant parties that have most of all the same concerns.

It's a matter of framing for the situation. I'd rather read something that talks about both sides instead of just one.