this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
849 points (96.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

36232 readers
578 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Maybe it's your job to avoid patronizing places that don't pay their employees enough though?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, it's not, however as a near-minimum wage worker myself, it is also not my job to cover a massive corporation's lack of proper budgeting...

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you keep patronizing such businesses, why would they ever do that? They know they don't have to in order to get your money. And it is the same with your own near-minimum wage job. You are working against your own best interests. Nothing will change while people are willing to give their money to companies that don't pay their workers a fair wage.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against tipping if the person did a good job, but a company trying to guilt trip me into giving them a mandatory tip? Nah, that's bullshit, it's essentially "Oh, we can't pay our employees enough, would you mind helping 🥺". Outta here with that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Right,so don't use those businesses. You give them no reason to do anything differently.

All you are doing is helping to maintain the status quo.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think it is the case of "you think in the right direction, but you don't do it all the way, so now I'm gonna attack you over this until you stop doing anything".

Not paying tips is a good start.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Can you give an example of that ever working? Because boycotts sure as fuck work.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Rewarding the employer for underpaying the employees is not, in any way, the right direction, though? Not tipping is just telling the employees "I don't care if you get paid, so long as I get what I want"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How? Those people just aren't going to get the money. Its not like the company is going to pay them extra because you didnt tip. Theyve already decided that the wage will be low Your logic doesn't really make sense

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

There is a minimum amount of total money the employee could make before they'd go and work somewhere else instead. So if, hypothetically, everyone in a country where tipping is common even for non-exceptional service just stopped paying tips, hospitality employers would be forced to pay more to stay competitive with other non-customer-facing industries.

Of course, a drastic shock to the economy like that would probably cause a lot of upheaval, as some employers struggle to accept the new norm.

However, the same thing would work even if the change was slower - e.g. if 5% of people didn't tip, and did it very obviously and vocally, and then the practice spread as it reached 10% and so on.

Obviously it sucks for the employees who get hit by the first few non-tippers, but over the long term it would be for the better for worker rights. So I could absolutely see it working.

That said, I say this from a country where tipping is not the norm (except maybe the occasional 'keep the change' for exceptional service), and the law and expectation is that the most prominent displayed price is the total price you pay - and people react very negatively towards businesses seen as trying to bring in American style tipping culture.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I would not, that's... what I'm trying to imply here... Yeah, businesses who don't pay their employees enough bad.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

You don't get it, I think? The point is to get the workers to quit or protest because they don't get paid enough, so that the place can increase the prices instead so they can pay their workers. If the place is still providing a nice service or good food or whatever it may be, you don't want it to go out of business. Just make a worker-positive change.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It takes everyone to fix these issues. It is not a one-sided job. Every time you give these establishments money, you help them.

And there is no shortage of replacement waiters out there for the ones who quit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm trying to help the establishment, by changing their ways. Not by bankrupting them. And if they just keep changing waiters, surely the quality of service will go down and Darwin takes care of the rest.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can you give an example of this "I give them money and expect their employees to quit unless they get paid better" strategy working in the past?

Don't you think people boycott for a reason?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can not. Can you give an example of boycotting a business causing that business to raise prices to pay their employees a living wage? If so, I guess let's go with your thing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Cool, I guess that's the only solution then. 🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most people won't quit, especially in the US from what I know. If they are already underpaid, how can they quit? And if pretty much every place treats waiters the same, what choice do they have?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

They won't have a choice but to quit if we all boycott the business either.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I absolutely will pick the no-tips place given a choice, but I take issue with that wording. Basically every business pays as little as possible, by design.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"As little as possible" and "not enough" are two different things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I suppose, but it's really hard to separate. You have to pick a cutoff, which in the face of a world full of intangible wealth and costs is hard, and then if you come out with a number that's too high you basically have nowhere you can shop.

There's select industries that are super shitty, and I avoid those, but paying minimum wage for unskilled labour is a normal industry. (And, ironically, a lot of the fair-ethical-organic type businesses are super shitty themselves, because everyone wants to get paid extra and some will do horrible things to make that happen)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're saying this like it's necessary to eat in restaurants with waiters. It isn't. It's a luxury.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, where are you? I thought I recognised you from .ca, but it sounds like you might be thinking of the US system where they can pay nothing except tips. In my province you earn at least minimum wage as a waiter, and tips.

If I were to just straight up refuse to eat from restaurants under any circumstance, I'd be heavily incurring those intangible costs I mentioned, because it's an expected social thing. That being said, I might consider it if I was in the US, but I'm not.

Also, tips have expanded well beyond servers, but that's kind of beside the point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Well you thought wrong. I was born and raised in the U.S. and lived there until about two weeks ago when we fled.

And in my 47 years in America, I was never in a situation where I couldn't say, "no thanks" if someone invited me to a restaurant. And who invites you to restaurants and makes you pay?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Like, most people. Unless they offer, it's not culturally expected to be a gift. "No, I won't discuss this over coffee"/"no, we can't have the meeting at a restaurant" would go over like a wet fart, and explaining that it's because of minimum wage workers wouldn't make it much better. (FWIW I'm also poor enough that's a pretty big expense, but middle and upper class people hate being reminded people like me exist)

Congratulations on getting out. Best of luck wherever you are now.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago

Certainly not lol, what a ridiculous thing to say