this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
141 points (98.0% liked)

chat

8285 readers
64 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I (36F) always wear bright red lipstick whenever I decide I'm not going to let my husband (52M) win. AITA?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is this intended to be a complete nonsequitur cause I do not understand...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In the history of "girls can't play chess", there was a time when Anna Rudolf was accused of cheating with lip balm somehow.

So this was meant as an example of someone trolling the chess-loser subreddit. The fictional, suspiciously age-gappy husband can't comprehend that he isn't winning for himself, and the super-obvious lipstick is to bait him into ridiculous accusations of cheating. Would such behaviour be assholish? The subreddit decides.

And since I'm explaining the joke anyway, there's also an underlying criticism of the way women have to manage the egos of men—particularly the kind inhabiting OP's fictional subreddit—by letting them win, etc. So, no, absolutely not a non sequitur.