submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/news@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 42 points 2 years ago (13 children)

Yeah, Republicans could theoretically pass this since they control house and Senate...we're fudged

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    They would have to end the filibuster in the Senate to do so, I assume. Not saying that they won't -- it was always a cope for Democrats to not do so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    They won't hesitate to do that for their pet issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    I dunno I can totally see them saying "muh norms and traditions are more important than any single bill".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Republicans don't give a single shit about "norms", which tbf is their only respectable quality. This wouldn't be unprecedented either, since in the past they eliminated filibustering for passing the government budget (which is why the parliamentarian was able to block the minimum wage increase, because the parliamentarian decides what is and isn't part of the "budget" and the dems tried to pass the minimum wage through the budget).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Don't you need more than a simple majority to pass an amendment?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago

    It's not an amendment. We don't have the bill text but it appears that based on the title it will be them implementing a ban based on some interpretation of the 14th constitutional amendment, section 1 of which reads:

    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    this is where bipartisanship comes in

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Dems will vote yes and then pat themselves on the back for being “classy losers”.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments