this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
548 points (96.9% liked)

Fedimigration Organizing

352 readers
1 users here now

This is a place to share resources and coordinate projects to assist in the migration away from legacy social media.

founded 4 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 79 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

I would drop the "no censorship" "free from manipulation" and "true freedom of speech" none of those are technically true and the later is associated with extremist rhetoric.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 20 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah a lot of Luigi sentiment was toasted directly by admins, so, you know

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 23 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Specifically in .world, which is the instance they are advertising.

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 7 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

idk why they picked world over lemmee or shitjustworks, both of those seem like better picks

[–] Kyouki@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

What are the differences?

[–] golli@lemm.ee 4 points 4 weeks ago

Tbh i am not a fan of any of those points:

  • Free from Manipulation: Malicious actors can still make dummy accounts to influcence scores and there is also nothing inherent in the system that truly prevents manipulative content

  • No Censorship. No tracking: Censorship can still happen on a instance basis through bans or defederation, althought those are also necessary tools for other reasons. And no tracking imo also is missleading, simply because everything posted here is public (including up/downvotes), there simply isn't true privacy in a public forum. It's better in that it doesn't follow you around to other websites and such, but still putting it so difinitive is wrong.

  • True freedom of speech: Kind of overlaps with the "no censorship" part i think.


What the fediverse is to me is:

  • Diversity and freedom of choice

  • Resilience against central control