this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
44 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10187 readers
217 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, this is what the Republicans are doing...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The article is literally about the opposite happening though, so your comment reads both as a total non-sequitur and like you didn't read even the headline.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry you didn't understand the point I was making at all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The comment is trying to point out, albeit obtusely, that democrats have also funded crazy people on opposite end of the political spectrum. In 2022 the democrats funded far right candidates in hopes they would win the primary and be an easy victory royale for the dem candidate. The comment is trying to analogize these two things, which is fair because it is a similar political strategy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Trump actually was one of those candidates. However, I don't think it is directly analogous. Trump won and it was bad for Democrats. If RFK wins on the other hand, it would certainly be good for Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Right, but this is an example of funding a far-right candidate in a Democratic primary, where they stand essentially no chance of winning it. There's some other goal here, such as landing trolls inside the Democratic convention to disrupt the ability to negotiate a party platform.