this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
577 points (95.9% liked)

simpsonsshitposting

3032 readers
813 users here now

I just think they're neat!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Duff CEO with a Windows-Logo on his forehead: "Gamers use Windows because of its' user experience not our de facto monopoly."

Next Image: Duff CEO with Windows-Logo in front of a "Out of Business" sign. Subtitle: "30 minutes after SteamOS is released"

Edit: Yo, I'm not saying this is gonna happen. I just want to say that Windew's UX sucks ass.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's not a monopoly and it's certainly one of the best services out there so if GabeN has a spot in the line, it's at the back of it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

If Steam isn't a monopoly because the Epic Games store and GoG exists, then Windows isn't a monopoly because Mac and Linux exist.

Look, I like Valve. They are better than the vast majority of big game companies out there. They aren't perfect, though, and they definitely have a monopoly on online PC game distribution. We shouldn't be blind to that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

There are people using Windows who would very much rather not use Windows but need to because it is the only way to use given software. I haven't heard of anyone who would very much rather not use Steam but has to in order to access a given game.

In this regard Windows has more in common with Epic and their paid exclusives than Steam.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Which still doesn't disprove the monopoly claim. Steam can be a monopoly even if people like to use it. Valve could very well change in the future. We can hope for the best, but we're basing a lot on the continued goodwill of a single company.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 minutes ago

Steam is a "monopoly" because some devs don't bother selling their games on other stores. If they wanted to make their games available on other stores tomorrow they could do so very easily.

Windows is a "monopoly" because certain software is not compatible with other OSs, if the devs wanted to make them available on other OSs tomorrow that would be very difficult.

Epic is a "monopoly" because they are legally binding devs to not make their games available on other stores. If they wanted to make their games available in other stores tomorrow they are legally not allowed to do so.

Which is to say if Valve changes in the future and becomes shit companies and users can easily leave for other platforms.