this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
173 points (97.3% liked)

World News

39522 readers
1979 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A new study from Spain’s Autonomous University of Barcelona reveals that tea bags made from nylon, polypropylene, and cellulose release billions of micro- and nanoplastic particles when steeped in boiling water.

These particles, which can enter human intestinal cells, may pose health risks, potentially affecting the digestive, respiratory, endocrine, and immune systems.

Researchers urge regulatory action to mitigate plastic contamination in food packaging.

Consumers are advised to use loose-leaf tea with stainless steel infusers or biodegradable tea bags to minimize exposure.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

One thing to note with all these articles; so far, there are no major comprehensive studies that definitively show microplastics are a danger to the body, or show what levels are considered acceptable or not.

Considering the entire world population hasn't just collectively died in the last 50 years, I'm leaning towards the effects of microplastics being negligible, or at least a hell of a lot less dangerous than other established risks like processed meat or direct sunlight.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microplastics_and_human_health


The potential health impacts of microplastics vary based on factors, such as their particle sizes, shape, exposure time, chemical composition (enriched with heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), etc.), surface properties, and associated contaminants.[76][77]

Experimental and observational studies in mammals have shown that microplastics and nanoplastics exposure have the following adverse effects:

On the cellular level

Inflammation[78][79]  
Oxidative stress[80][78][81][82][77]  
Genotoxicity[83][82]  
Cytotoxicity[81][77]  

By systems

Cardiovascular[84][62]  
Respiratory[59]  
    Inflammation in the lungs from inhalation[75]  
Disruption of hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA), including the Hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid, Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal, Hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular and Hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis[85]  
Reproductive toxicity,[85] decreased reproductive health, decreased sperm quality[85]  
Developmental abnormalities[85]  
Immunotoxicity[85][86][81][79]  
Endocrine disruption[85][87]  
Neurotoxicity[85]  
Metabolic disturbances[78]  
    Disrupted gut-liver axis resulting in increased risk of insulin resistance[88]  
    disrupted hormone function, potentially contributing to weight gain.[89][90]  

Epidemiological studies

Despite growing concern and evidence, most epidemiologic studies have focused on characterizing exposures. Epidemiological studies directly linking microplastics to adverse health effects in humans remain yet limited and research is ongoing to determine the full extent of potential harm caused by microplastics and their long-term impact on human health.[91][92]


There is plenty of reason to consider microplastics a major adverse health factor. The problem is that it is a relatively new field of research and making an epidemiological assessment is difficult as we are exposed to thousands of harmful substances, so knowing which effect comes from what is not a trivial thing to figure out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

We tried that approach with leaded gasoline and paint, asbestos building materials, cigarettes, and a variety of other things over the past several generations. They didn't kill the entire world population, but things didn't turn out so well for the people who waited for definitive studies. Good luck with your gamble.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 49 minutes ago

There's no gamble though. Microplastics are unavoidable. I guarantee that you and every other poster here are filled with them.